mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Choose Wisely and Privately: Proactive Client Selection for Fair and Efficient Federated Learning

arXiv 2605.20975 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning enables collaborative model training across decentralized data sources without data transfer. Averaging-based FL is limited by the presence of non-IID data, which negatively impacts convergence speed and final model accuracy. Conventional alternatives suffer from significant inefficiency. Clients with noisy or highly heterogeneous data contribute expensive gradient computations that are either discarded or heavily down-weighted before aggregation. These reactive approaches waste computational resources, require more communication rounds and result in unnecessary privacy exposure. In this paper, we propose a proactive client selection framework that aims to find an optimal federation of clients whose combined data match utility and fairness requirements before training begins. Our method relies on mutual information computed from differentially private contingency tables to quantify the relevance of cross-feature correlations in the union dataset. We introduce a Potential Federation Loss (PFL) over the set of fixed-size federations, which balances two objectives. Maximizing collective data utility while ensuring fair cross-features correlations to prevent group unfairness. Client selection is expressed as an optimal subset search problem over the PFL objective, which we solve using simulated annealing under strong differential privacy guarantees for clients' local statistics. Experimental results on four benchmarks show faster, fairer, and more accurate models trained on optimally found federations, compared to uniform sampling, even when state-of-the-art adaptive aggregation or sampling strategies are employed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

29 of 63 references.

References · 29

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
  7. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
  8. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  9. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  10. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  11. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  12. 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 202
17 more
  1. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
  2. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  3. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
  4. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 143
  5. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 114
  6. 2022Federated Learning with Partial Model Personalizationcited by 114
  7. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  8. 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
  9. 2020Communication-Efficient Federated Learning via Optimal Client Samplingcited by 39
  10. 2021Improving Fairness via Federated Learningcited by 39
  11. 2020Bandit-based Communication-Efficient Client Selection Strategies for Federated Learningcited by 29
  12. 2020POSEIDON: Privacy-Preserving Federated Neural Network Learningcited by 23
  13. 2023Data Valuation and Detections in Federated Learningcited by 17
  14. 2023Bias Propagation in Federated Learningcited by 12
  15. 2024SoK: On Gradient Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 12
  16. 2018Structure and Sensitivity in Differential Privacy: Comparing K-Norm Mechanismscited by 9
  17. 2023FedSampling: A Better Sampling Strategy for Federated Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.