QwenSafe: Multimodal Content Rating Description Identification via Preference-Aligned VLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Mobile app marketplaces require developers to disclose standardized content rating descriptors (CRDs) to inform users about potentially sensitive or restricted content. Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of these disclosures remains challenging due to the multimodal nature of app content, which spans textual descriptions and visual interfaces. In this paper, we present QwenSafe, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) designed to automatically identify the presence of Apple-defined CRDs by jointly reasoning over app metadata and screenshots. To enable scalable training for this task, we introduce metadata2CRD, a data-construction pipeline that synthesizes descriptor-aligned question-answer pairs by combining app descriptions, screenshots, and formal descriptor definitions. We adapt Qwen3-VL-8B using supervised fine-tuning followed by Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align model predictions with descriptor-specific evidence and explanations across visual and textual modalities. We evaluate QwenSafe on 12 Apple-defined content rating descriptors and compare it against state-of-the-art vision-language models, including Qwen3-VL, LLaVA-1.6, and Gemini-2.5-Flash. QwenSafe consistently outperforms all baselines in binary CRD classification, achieving improvements in positive-class recall of 111.8%, 36.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that descriptor-aware multimodal alignment substantially improves automated content classification and highlights the potential of vision-language models to support scalable and consistent content rating in mobile app marketplaces.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
10 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 9
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 490
- 2021Detecting Hate Speech with GPT-3cited by 56
- 2023Pro-Cap: Leveraging a Frozen Vision-Language Model for Hateful Meme Detectioncited by 47
- 2024An Investigation of Large Language Models for Real-World Hate Speech Detectioncited by 20
- 2025Cross-Modal Transfer from Memes to Videos: Addressing Data Scarcity in Hateful Video Detectioncited by 9
- 2023Not Seen, Not Heard in the Digital World! Measuring Privacy Practices in Children's Appscited by 4
- 2025Detecting Content Rating Violations in Android Applications: A Vision-Language Approachcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Stars: Bridging the Gap Between Ratings and Review Sentiment with LLM
- 2024MMEvalPro: Calibrating Multimodal Benchmarks Towards Trustworthy and Efficient Evaluation
- 2024Value-Spectrum: Quantifying Preferences of Vision-Language Models via Value Decomposition in Social Media Contexts
- 2025SNS-Bench-VL: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models in Social Networking Services
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond
- 2024Task Me Anything
- 2025PCR-CA: Parallel Codebook Representations with Contrastive Alignment for Multiple-Category App Recommendation