OmniISR: A Unified Framework for Centralized and Federated Learning via Intermediate Supervision and Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The global deployment of edge intelligence operates across heterogeneous legal frameworks. While some regions permit centralized learning (CL) via cloud data aggregation, others enforce strict data localization, necessitating federated learning (FL). This operational dichotomy introduces two incompatible optimization regimes (i.e., unbiased global gradients yet coupled with internal covariate shift in CL versus biased, drift-prone local updates in FL), resulting in that any naive integration of the two lacks rigorous theoretical guarantees. To fill this gap, we propose OmniISR, a unified framework that fuses pure CL, pure FL, and hybrid CL-FL training modes via equipping intermediate supervision and regularization (ISR) signals at multiple hidden layers. Specifically, we propose (i) to use mutual-information (MI) as intermediate supervision to align shifting internal covariate in CL and client-drifting representations in FL, and (ii) to adopt negative-entropy (NE) as intermediate regularizer to penalize overconfident prediction, preserve representational uncertainty, and avoid device-specific collapse. On the theory side, we derive (i) a unified, ISR-agnostic, and non-asymptotic O(1/sqrt(T)) convergence bound that shows the introduced ISR does not violate standard SGD convergence, (ii) a federated drift-bound that quantifies the ISR-reduced client drift, (iii) a gradient-alignment guarantee that ensures non-conflicting CL and FL updates under mild bias, and (iv) an explicit escape-time bound that indicates that CL-FL hybrid mixing enlarges effective stochasticity and accelerates escape from strict saddles. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OmniISR consistently improves model performance in both centralized and federated paradigms, reduces the CL-FL gap by 22.60%, and yields 37/48 paired metric wins across multiple FL algorithms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
40 of 59 references.
References · 40
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
28 more
- 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 367
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 285
- 2017ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Imagescited by 261
- 2019Gated-SCNN: Gated Shape CNNs for Semantic Segmentationcited by 166
- 2020Federated Visual Classification with Real-World Data Distributioncited by 128
- 2022TopFormer: Token Pyramid Transformer for Mobile Semantic Segmentationcited by 82
- 2022Neural networks trained with SGD learn distributions of increasing complexitycited by 50
- 2022FedDrive: Generalizing Federated Learning to Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 41
- 2015Training Deeper Convolutional Networks with Deep Supervisioncited by 36
- 2024S-NeRF++: Autonomous Driving Simulation via Neural Reconstruction and Generationcited by 28
- 2022Contrastive Deep Supervisioncited by 20
- 2023FLuID: Mitigating Stragglers in Federated Learning using Invariant Dropoutcited by 16
- 2024pFedLVM: A Large Vision Model (LVM)-Driven and Latent Feature-Based Personalized Federated Learning Framework in Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
- 2022Tighter Regret Analysis and Optimization of Online Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2024Take A Shortcut Back: Mitigating the Gradient Vanishing for Training Spiking Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2022A Comprehensive Review on Deep Supervision: Theories and Applicationscited by 10
- 2024FedRC: A Rapid-Converged Hierarchical Federated Learning Framework in Street Scene Semantic Understandingcited by 8
- 2024Fast-Convergent and Communication-Alleviated Heterogeneous Hierarchical Federated Learning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 8
- 2023Communication Resources Constrained Hierarchical Federated Learning for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 7
- 2025Robust Asymmetric Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Corrupted Clientscited by 5
- 2025FedEMA: Federated Exponential Moving Averaging with Negative Entropy Regularizer in Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
- 2023Reducing Non-IID Effects in Federated Autonomous Driving with Contrastive Divergence Losscited by 3
- 2023Towards Understanding Generalization and Stability Gaps between Centralized and Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2023Detection-based Intermediate Supervision for Visual Question Answeringcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.