mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Multi-Agent Framework for Feature-Constrained Difficulty Control in Reading Comprehension Item Generation

arXiv 2605.19316 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies in difficulty-controlled reading comprehension item generation have leveraged large language models (LLMs) to produce items by adjusting difficulty-related features. However, existing methods typically rely on a single-agent prompting approach, which often fails to consistently satisfy specified feature constraints, resulting in items that deviate from the target difficulty level. To address this limitation, we introduce MAFIG, a Multi-agent Framework for Feature-constrained Item Generation, where multiple LLM agents and feature-specific evaluators collaborate to generate and iteratively revise items based on intended constraints. Furthermore, to verify the efficacy of MAFIG in difficulty control, we propose a method for constructing a sequence of feature constraint sets that yield items with monotonically increasing difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that MAFIG generates items that adhere to target constraints at a significantly higher rate than baselines, achieving robust difficulty control through the difficulty-calibrated constraint sequence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents5 Jun

Other references · 12

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  5. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  6. 2024Generative Students: Using LLM-Simulated Student Profiles to Support Question Item Evaluationcited by 56
  7. 2025METAL: A Multi-Agent Framework for Chart Generation with Test-Time Scalingcited by 33
  8. 2024Zero-Shot Strategies for Length-Controllable Summarizationcited by 10
  9. 2025Assessing AI-Generated Questions' Alignment with Cognitive Frameworks in Educational Assessmentcited by 8
  10. 2024Question Difficulty Ranking for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehensioncited by 7
  11. 2025Can LLMs Estimate Cognitive Complexity of Reading Comprehension Items?cited by 4
  12. 2025KAQG: A Knowledge-Graph-Enhanced RAG for Difficulty-Controlled Question Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Cognitively Diverse Multiple-Choice Question Generation: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework with Large Language Models
  2. 2025Difficulty-Controllable Multiple-Choice Question Generation Using Large Language Models and Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2025Reasoning and Sampling-Augmented MCQ Difficulty Prediction via LLMs
  4. 2025SMART: Simulated Students Aligned with Item Response Theory for Question Difficulty Prediction
  5. 2025Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework For Math Problem Generation
  6. 2025Large-Scale Constraint Generation -- Can LLMs Parse Hundreds of Constraints?
  7. 2025Can LLMs Estimate Student Struggles? Human-AI Difficulty Alignment with Proficiency Simulation for Item Difficulty Prediction
  8. 2024RISCORE: Enhancing In-Context Riddle Solving in Language Models through Context-Reconstructed Example Augmentation