mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OpenCompass: A Universal Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models

arXiv 2605.19276 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the field of artificial intelligence has undergone a paradigm shift from task-specific small-scale models to general-purpose large language models (LLMs). With the rapid iteration of LLMs, objective, quantitative, and comprehensive evaluation of their capabilities has become a critical link in advancing technological development. Currently, the mainstream static benchmark dataset-based evaluation methods face challenges such as the diversity of task types, inconsistent evaluation criteria, and fragmentation of data and processing workflows, making it difficult to efficiently conduct cross-domain and large-scale model evaluation. To address the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes and open-sources OpenCompass, a one-stop, scalable, and high-concurrency-supported general-purpose LLM evaluation platform. Adhering to the design philosophy of modularization and component decoupling, the platform boasts three core advantages: high compatibility, flexibility, and high concurrency. The core architecture of OpenCompass comprises five key components: the Configuration System, Task Partitioning Module, Execution and Scheduling Module, Task Execution Unit, and Result Visualization Module. Its workflow provides rule-based, LLM-as-a-Judge, and cascaded evaluators to adapt to the requirements of different task scenarios. Supporting mainstream benchmark datasets across multiple domains, including knowledge, reasoning, computation, science, language, code, etc., the platform offers a unified and efficient LLM evaluation tool for both academia and industry, facilitating the accurate identification of strengths and weaknesses of LLMs as well as their subsequent optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 21 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  7. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  8. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  9. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  10. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  11. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  12. 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 345
7 more
  1. 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 178
  2. 2024LlaSMol: Advancing Large Language Models for Chemistry with a Large-Scale, Comprehensive, High-Quality Instruction Tuning Datasetcited by 124
  3. 2024ARC Prize 2024: Technical Reportcited by 103
  4. 2023OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learningcited by 51
  5. 2025PHYSICS: Benchmarking Foundation Models on University-Level Physics Problem Solvingcited by 31
  6. 2024P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMscited by 29
  7. 2024ClimaQA: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Climate Question Answering Modelscited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.