EVA-0: Test-Time Model Evolution with Only Two Forward Passes per Sample
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time model evolution offers a promising way for deployed models to improve from unlabeled test-time experience, yet most existing methods depend on backpropagation (BP), which incurs substantial memory overhead and makes them difficult to deploy on edge devices, quantized models, specialized accelerators, or black-box models. In this work, we study test-time model evolution under a strict two-forward budget, a setting that pushes adaptation toward highly efficient real-world deployment. We reveal three key obstacles in zeroth-order test-time optimization: susceptibility to shortcut solutions, uncontrolled weight drift, and ineffective update direction estimation. To overcome them, we propose EVA-0, a minimal zeroth-order adaptation framework that: 1) keeps the loss scale-invariant to prevent shortcut solutions; 2) devises an anchor-guided optimization strategy to alleviate weight drift; 3) uses sample-wise symmetric two-sided perturbation for update direction estimation and inference. EVA-0 requires no BP and performs both inference and adaptation within only two forward passes per sample. Results on ImageNet-C & ViT-Base show that EVA-0 outperforms both BP-based DeYO and BP-free FOA, while achieving a 14x speed-up over FOA. Code will be released.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
39 of 50 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
27 more
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2013Optimal rates for zero-order convex optimization: the power of two function evaluationscited by 198
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
- 2021PTQ4ViT: Post-training quantization for vision transformers with twin uniform quantizationcited by 179
- 2020A Primer on Zeroth-Order Optimization in Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 162
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2023DeepZero: Scaling up Zeroth-Order Optimization for Deep Model Trainingcited by 76
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2022Back to the Source: Diffusion-Driven Test-Time Adaptationcited by 71
- 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
- 2024Variance-reduced Zeroth-Order Methods for Fine-Tuning Language Modelscited by 54
- 2021Test-time Batch Statistics Calibration for Covariate Shiftcited by 50
- 2020Zeroth-Order Regularized Optimization (ZORO): Approximately Sparse Gradients and Adaptive Samplingcited by 46
- 2022TTTFlow: Unsupervised Test-Time Training with Normalizing Flowcited by 33
- 2023Continual-MAE: Adaptive Distribution Masked Autoencoders for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 30
- 2023TEA: Test-time Energy Adaptationcited by 25
- 2021On the Convergence of Prior-Guided Zeroth-Order Optimization Algorithmscited by 23
- 2026Why AI systems don't learn and what to do about it: Lessons on autonomous learning from cognitive sciencecited by 11
- 2025Test-Time Model Adaptation for Quantized Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2025Synchronizing Task Behavior: Aligning Multiple Tasks during Test-Time Trainingcited by 5
- 2025DocTTT: Test-Time Training for Handwritten Document Recognition Using Meta-Auxiliary Learningcited by 3
- 2026FOZO: Forward-Only Zeroth-Order Prompt Optimization for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Turn Down the Noise: Leveraging Diffusion Models for Test-time Adaptation via Pseudo-label Ensembling
- 2026ZOTTA: Test-Time Adaptation with Gradient-Free Zeroth-Order Optimization
- 2025Scaling Image and Video Generation via Test-Time Evolutionary Search
- 2024Everything to the Synthetic: Diffusion-driven Test-time Adaptation via Synthetic-Domain Alignment
- 2025MoETTA: Test-Time Adaptation Under Mixed Distribution Shifts with MoE-LayerNorm
- 2025LeanTTA: A Backpropagation-Free and Stateless Approach to Quantized Test-Time Adaptation on Edge Devices
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Survey
- 2025ReservoirTTA: Prolonged Test-time Adaptation for Evolving and Recurring Domains