Position: Let's Develop Data Probes to Fundamentally Understand How Data Affects LLM Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data is fundamental to large language models (LLMs). However, understanding of what makes certain data useful for different stages of an LLM workflow, including training, tuning, alignment, in-context learning, etc., and why, remains an open question. Current approaches rely heavily on extensive experimentation with large public datasets to obtain empirical heuristics for data filtering and dataset construction. These approaches are compute intensive and lack a principled way of understanding the essence of how specific data characteristics drive LLM behavior. In this position paper, we advocate for the need of developing systematic methodologies for generating synthetic sequences from appropriately defined random processes, with the goal that these sequences can reveal useful characteristics when they are used in one or multiple stages of the LLM workflow. We refer to such sequences as data probes. By observing LLM behavior on data probes, researchers can systematically conduct studies on how data characteristics influence model performance, generalization, and robustness. The probing sequences exhibit statistical properties that can be viewed using theoretical concepts, such as typical sets, which are generalized to describe the behaviors of LLMs. This data-probe approach provides a pathway for uncovering foundational insights into the role of data in LLM training and inference, beyond empirical heuristics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 40 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 732
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
13 more
- 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 182
- 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 160
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
- 2024The Evolution of Statistical Induction Heads: In-Context Learning Markov Chainscited by 118
- 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 111
- 2021Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Datacited by 91
- 2023How to Catch an AI Liar: Lie Detection in Black-Box LLMs by Asking Unrelated Questionscited by 83
- 2024Large Language Models as Markov Chainscited by 35
- 2024Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answerscited by 31
- 2024Transformers on Markov Data: Constant Depth Sufficescited by 27
- 2025Predicting the Performance of Black-box LLMs through Follow-up Queriescited by 9
- 2025GneissWeb: Preparing High Quality Data for LLMs at Scalecited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.