PACE: Geometry-Aware Bridge Transport for Single-Cell Trajectory Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Single-cell trajectory inference from destructive time-course snapshots is fundamentally ill-posed: neither cross-time cell correspondences nor continuous trajectories are observed, so the snapshot distributions alone do not uniquely determine the underlying dynamics. Existing optimal transport and flow-based methods typically couple cells by Euclidean proximity at observed clock times, which can misalign trajectories when development is asynchronous and cells sampled at the same experimental time occupy different latent pseudotime stages. We propose PACE, a trajectory inference framework that recovers geometry-consistent continuous transport dynamics from destructive time-course snapshots through three coupled components. First, PACE constructs a state- and time-dependent anisotropic Riemannian metric that assigns low transport cost along locally supported tangent directions while penalizing normal velocity components. Second, it alternates between refining cross-time couplings under the induced path-action cost and fitting endpoint-preserving neural bridges between adjacent snapshots. Third, it distills the learned bridge dynamics into a global continuous-time velocity field over cellular states. Across seven controlled and biological datasets covering nine held-out reconstruction experiments, PACE achieves the strongest overall reconstruction performance, reducing MMD, Wasserstein-1 distance, and Wasserstein-2 distance by 23.7% on average relative to the strongest competing baseline. PACE also improves RNA-velocity alignment by 15.4% on an embryoid body differentiation benchmark, without requiring explicit cell pairing, lineage tracing, or RNA-velocity supervision during training. Code is available at https://github.com/AI4Science-WestlakeU/PACE.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 41 references.
References · 14
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 602
- 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
- 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 174
- 2020TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular Dynamicscited by 160
- 2023Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge Matchingcited by 153
- 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 98
- 2024Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifoldcited by 77
- 2022Manifold Interpolating Optimal-Transport Flows for Trajectory Inferencecited by 64
- 2023Deep Momentum Multi-Marginal Schr"odinger Bridgecited by 42
- 2021Towards a mathematical theory of trajectory inferencecited by 31
- 2024Multi-marginal Schr"odinger Bridges with Iterative Reference Refinementcited by 27
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.