mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decoupled Conformal Optimisation: Efficient Prediction Sets via Independent Tuning and Calibration

arXiv 2605.18354 ↗First posted 18 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian conformal optimisation methods often use the same held-out data both to search for efficient prediction sets and to certify coverage or risk. This coupling is natural for high-probability risk-control guarantees, but it is not necessary when the target is standard finite-sample marginal conformal coverage. We propose Decoupled Conformal Optimisation (DCO), a train-tune-calibrate design principle that uses an independent tuning split for efficiency-oriented structural selection and a fresh calibration split for the final conformal quantile. Conditional on the tuned structure, standard split-conformal exchangeability yields finite-sample marginal coverage for any candidate class, without a confidence parameter or multiple-testing correction. DCO therefore targets a different finite-sample guarantee from PAC-style methods: marginal conformal coverage rather than high-probability risk control. Under consistency assumptions on the coupled risk bound, the two approaches nevertheless converge to the same population threshold. Across classification and regression benchmarks, including ImageNet-A, CIFAR-100, Diabetes, California Housing, and Concrete, DCO tracks the nominal coverage level closely while often reducing average prediction-set size or interval width relative to PAC-style calibration. On ImageNet-A, for example, the average set size decreases from 26.52 to 25.26 and the 95th-percentile set size from 58.95 to 53.73; on Diabetes, the average interval width decreases from 2.098 to 1.914.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  2. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
  3. 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 366
  4. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 355
  5. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 272
  6. 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 271
  7. 2023Credal Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 45
  8. 2021Conformal Bayesian Computationcited by 39
  9. 2021Optimized conformal classification using gradient descent approximationcited by 28
  10. 2024Conformalized Credal Regions for Classification with Ambiguous Ground Truthcited by 19
  11. 2023On the Expected Size of Conformal Prediction Setscited by 13
  12. 2026Optimal Decision-Making Based on Prediction Setscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2026Bayesian Conformal Prediction as a Decision Risk Problemcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.