mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Learning by Utility-Constrained Stochastic Aggregation for Improving Rational Participation

arXiv 2605.18020 ↗First posted 18 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) algorithms implicitly assume that clients passively comply with server-side orchestration by sharing local model updates upon server request. However, this overlooks an important aspect in real-world cross-silo environments: clients are often rational agents who may prioritize their utilities such as local model performance over that of the global model. In settings with significant statistical heterogeneity, rational clients may opt out of the federation if the perceived benefits of collaboration fail to meet their local utility thresholds. Such attrition degrades the global model performance and can lead to the collapse of the federated training process. In this work, we introduce FedUCA, (Federated Learning by Utility-Constrained Stochastic Aggregation for Improving Rational Participation), a framework that formalizes the server's role as an optimizer seeking to maximize global model performance by sustaining client participation. We substantiate our framework through extensive experiments on standard datasets demonstrating that by prioritizing participation feasibility, FedUCA achieves significantly higher client retention and, consequently, a superior global model performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  6. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  7. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
  8. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  9. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  10. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
  11. 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
  12. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 394
11 more
  1. 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 190
  2. 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 179
  3. 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
  4. 2022FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learningcited by 64
  5. 2019Motivating Workers in Federated Learning: A Stackelberg Game Perspectivecited by 45
  6. 2022Mechanisms that Incentivize Data Sharing in Federated Learningcited by 39
  7. 2021A Comprehensive Survey of Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learningcited by 38
  8. 2023Incentive Mechanism Design for Unbiased Federated Learning with Randomized Client Participationcited by 8
  9. 2022Incentivizing Federated Learningcited by 5
  10. 2024Pursuing Overall Welfare in Federated Learning through Sequential Decision Makingcited by 2
  11. 2025DaringFed: A Dynamic Bayesian Persuasion Pricing for Online Federated Learning under Two-sided Incomplete Informationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.