Sample-efficient inductive matrix completion with noise and inexact side-information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inductive matrix completion (IMC) is a variant of low-rank matrix completion that incorporates row and column side-information. In principle, it can reduce the effective dimension of the recovery problem from the ambient matrix size to the dimension of the side-information features. Existing theory, however, does not fully realize this advantage in the noisy setting: sample-efficient guarantees only apply to noiseless recovery, while noisy guarantees require sample sizes comparable to ordinary matrix completion. This paper closes this gap for noisy IMC. We analyze a nonconvex projected gradient descent algorithm with spectral initialization and prove that, under exact side-information, it achieves linear convergence and stable recovery at a sample complexity governed by the effective side-information dimension rather than the ambient matrix dimension. The key technical ingredient is a local regularity condition for the IMC loss that holds at this reduced sample size, despite the mismatch between the observation pattern and the side-information subspaces. We further extend the analysis to inexact side-information, showing that the same reduced sample complexity is preserved and that the estimation error degrades optimally with the level of subspace misspecification. Motivated by this trade-off, we also propose a penalized interpolation between IMC and ordinary matrix completion that balances sample efficiency against robustness to imperfect side-information. Simulations and experiments on the MovieLens dataset support the theoretical findings and illustrate the practical benefits of exploiting side-information in low-sample regimes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 40 references.
References · 15
- 2020Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspectivecited by 112
- 2019Inductive Matrix Completion Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2020Accelerating Ill-Conditioned Low-Rank Matrix Estimation via Scaled Gradient Descentcited by 71
- 2019Noisy Matrix Completion: Understanding Statistical Guarantees for Convex Relaxation via Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 58
- 2016Convergence Analysis for Rectangular Matrix Completion Using Burer-Monteiro Factorization and Gradient Descentcited by 39
- 2019Inference and Uncertainty Quantification for Noisy Matrix Completioncited by 39
- 2013Provable Inductive Matrix Completioncited by 32
- 2013Incoherence-Optimal Matrix Completioncited by 27
- 2016Provable Efficient Online Matrix Completion via Non-convex Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 15
- 2021Inductive Matrix Completion Using Graph Autoencodercited by 9
- 2018Fast and Sample Efficient Inductive Matrix Completion via Multi-Phase Procrustes Flowcited by 8
- 2022Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithmcited by 4
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.