Artificial Adaptive Intelligence: The Missing Stage Between Narrow and General Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Between the narrow systems we deploy and the general intelligence we speculate about lies an entire regime of machine behavior that has never received its own name. This monograph argues that this regime is not empty: it is where meta-learning, neural architecture search, AutoML, continual learning, evolutionary computation, and physics-informed modeling have quietly converged on a common principle, namely the steady removal of the human from the loop of parameter specification. We name this regime Artificial Adaptive Intelligence (AAI) and define it operationally: a system exhibits AAI to the extent that it requires no human-specified tunable hyperparameters while maintaining competitive performance across a diverse distribution of tasks. To make the definition quantitative, we introduce an adaptivity index that measures progress along an axis orthogonal to scale, combining the fraction of hyperparameters absorbed by the system with the performance ratio against a task-specialized baseline. We develop the principle of parametric minimality and ground it in the minimum description length framework, showing that the appropriate hyperparameter count is data-determined rather than designer-determined. We then organize the field around three pathways to minimality: data- and task-aware configuration, structural and evolutionary morphing, and in-training self-adaptation. We analyze their stability, convergence, and governance implications, and illustrate them through case studies spanning aerospace design, financial regime detection, turbulence modeling, ecological dynamics, and vision-language systems. The thesis is that the path from ANI to AGI passes through AAI, and that naming this stage changes what we measure, what we build, and what we call a success.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 106 references.
References · 20
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 574
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
- 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 281
- 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 256
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 171
8 more
- 2019AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligencecited by 86
- 2020Learning to Continually Learncited by 84
- 2025Advancing Eurasia Fire Understanding Through Machine Learning Techniquescited by 5
- 2025MorphBoost: Self-Organizing Universal Gradient Boosting with Adaptive Tree Morphingcited by 4
- 2026PSTNet: Physically-Structured Turbulence Networkcited by 2
- 2026ORCA -- Online Regime Correlation Analyzercited by 2
- 2020OT-driven Multi-Domain Unsupervised Ultrasound Image Artifact Removal using a Single CNNcited by 1
- 2026AlphaJet: Automated Conceptual Aircraft Synthesis via Disentangled Generative Priors and Topology-Preserving Evolutionary Searchcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.