mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Practical Validity Conditions for Byzantine-Tolerant Federated Learning

arXiv 2605.15887 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust aggregation is the core operation in Byzantine-tolerant federated learning. To ensure the quality of aggregation independently of data distribution or attacks, validity conditions are needed. They provide geometric guarantees of where the output of the aggregation must lie. The widespread convex validity requires the output to lie in the convex hull of the honest vectors. Although this guarantee is strong in theory, it is poorly suited to modern federated learning systems, as it has dimension-dependent resilience and excludes many practical aggregation rules. We introduce the minimum enclosing ball (MEB) validity condition for robust aggregation, as well as its multiplicative relaxation, c-MEB validity, where c is a constant. We show that exact MEB validity still suffers from limited resilience, while relaxed c-MEB validity is achievable if a majority of clients is honest, i.e. n>2t. We give an optimal MinMax-MEB rule for the relaxed condition with the bound c<√2 and prove explicit relaxed-MEB guarantees for standard aggregators including minimum-diameter averaging, medoid and geometric median. Finally, we relate MEB validity to convex, relaxed-convex and box validity studied in prior literature, thus providing a systematic map of geometric validity conditions for Byzantine-robust aggregation. Our results show that relaxed MEB validity connects validity conditions in distributed computing and Byzantine-tolerant aggregation rules, and offers a practical alternative to convex validity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  4. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
  5. 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
  6. 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
  7. 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 141
  8. 2018Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGDcited by 95
  9. 2023Fixing by Mixing: A Recipe for Optimal Byzantine ML under Heterogeneitycited by 65
  10. 2020Collaborative Learning in the Jungle (Decentralized, Byzantine, Heterogeneous, Asynchronous and Nonconvex Learning)cited by 54
  11. 2020Reliable Graph Neural Networks via Robust Aggregationcited by 43
  12. 2016Geometric Median in Nearly Linear Timecited by 39
9 more
  1. 2021Approximate Byzantine Fault-Tolerance in Distributed Optimizationcited by 28
  2. 2024Adaptive Gradient Clipping for Robust Federated Learningcited by 11
  3. 2025Towards Trustworthy Federated Learning with Untrusted Participantscited by 8
  4. 2013Byzantine Vector Consensus in Complete Graphscited by 4
  5. 2024Private Geometric Mediancited by 3
  6. 2023On the Validity of Consensuscited by 2
  7. 2023Centroid Approximation with Multidimensional Approximate Agreement Protocolscited by 2
  8. 2016Relaxed Byzantine Vector Consensuscited by 1
  9. 2025Approximate Agreement Algorithms for Byzantine Collaborative Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.