Approximate Agreement Algorithms for Byzantine Collaborative Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Byzantine collaborative learning, n clients in a peer-to-peer network collectively learn a model without sharing their data by exchanging and aggregating stochastic gradient estimates. Byzantine clients can prevent others from collecting identical sets of gradient estimates. The aggregation step thus needs to be combined with an efficient (approximate) agreement subroutine to ensure convergence of the training process. In this work, we study the geometric median aggregation rule for Byzantine collaborative learning. We show that known approaches do not provide theoretical guarantees on convergence or gradient quality in the agreement subroutine. To satisfy these theoretical guarantees, we present a hyperbox algorithm for geometric median aggregation. We practically evaluate our algorithm in both centralized and decentralized settings under Byzantine attacks on non-i.i.d. data. We show that our geometric median-based approaches can tolerate sign-flip attacks better than known mean-based approaches from the literature.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 54 references.
References · 24
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
12 more
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
- 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 195
- 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
- 2021Differentially Private Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 74
- 2017Distributed Statistical Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings: Byzantine Gradient Descentcited by 59
- 2020Collaborative Learning in the Jungle (Decentralized, Byzantine, Heterogeneous, Asynchronous and Nonconvex Learning)cited by 54
- 2021Challenges and Approaches for Mitigating Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 47
- 2014Distributed Robust Learningcited by 13
- 2020SPEED: Secure, PrivatE, and Efficient Deep learningcited by 6
- 2013Byzantine Vector Consensus in Complete Graphscited by 4
- 2024SignSGD with Federated Defense: Harnessing Adversarial Attacks through Gradient Sign Decodingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.