GiLT: Augmenting Transformer Language Models with Dependency Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Augmenting Transformers with linguistic structures effectively enhances the syntactic generalization performance of language models. Previous work in this direction focuses on syntactic tree structures of languages, in particular constituency tree structures. We propose Graph-Infused Layers Transformer Language Model (GiLT) which leverages dependency graphs for augmenting Transformer language models. Unlike most previous work, GiLT does not insert extra structural tokens in language modeling; instead, it injects structural information into language modeling by modulating attention weights in the Transformer with features extracted from the dependency graph that is incrementally constructed along with token prediction. In our experiments, GiLT with semantic dependency graphs achieves better syntactic generalization while maintaining competitive perplexity in comparison with Transformer language model baselines. In addition, GiLT can be finetuned from a pretrained language model to achieve improved downstream task performance. Our code is released at https://github.com/cookie-pie-oops/GiLT-LM.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,850
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
- 2016Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 109
- 2020Automated Concatenation of Embeddings for Structured Predictioncited by 86
- 2019Tree Transformer: Integrating Tree Structures into Self-Attentioncited by 68
- 2019Unsupervised Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 47
- 2018Simpler but More Accurate Semantic Dependency Parsingcited by 46
11 more
- 2022Transformer Grammars: Augmenting Transformer Language Models with Syntactic Inductive Biases at Scalecited by 41
- 2017Effective Inference for Generative Neural Parsingcited by 25
- 2021Structural Guidance for Transformer Language Modelscited by 25
- 2023Pushdown Layers: Encoding Recursive Structure in Transformer Language Modelscited by 19
- 2020Guiding Attention for Self-Supervised Learning with Transformerscited by 14
- 2019PaLM: A Hybrid Parser and Language Modelcited by 13
- 2021Effective Batching for Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 12
- 2021Linguistic Frameworks Go Toe-to-Toe at Neuro-Symbolic Language Modelingcited by 10
- 2024Generative Pretrained Structured Transformers: Unsupervised Syntactic Language Models at Scalecited by 10
- 2015Dependency Recurrent Neural Language Models for Sentence Completioncited by 9
- 2024Dependency Transformer Grammars: Integrating Dependency Structures into Transformer Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026A Scaled-Up Empirical Study of Syntactic Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026A Scaled-Up Empirical Study of Syntactic Language Models12 Oct 2026