mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budget

arXiv 2605.14672 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating an N × N quantum kernel from circuit fidelities requires Theta(N2 S) measurement shots, the dominant bottleneck for deployment on near-term hardware. Existing budget-saving methods (Nystr"om-QKE, ShoFaR, kernel-target alignment) sub-sample which entries to measure but allocate shots uniformly within their chosen subset, ignoring how much each entry drives the downstream classifier. We close this gap with two contributions. First, a complete regime decomposition for shot-budgeted quantum kernel learning: a principled menu of when each allocator wins. Our method, AQKA, dominates the budget-limited regime (B lesssim 16 npairs) on sparse-sensitivity KRR, with the gap growing from +8 to +25 pts over uniform as N scales 225→1000 and reaching +26--32 pts on an textttibmpittsburgh (156-qubit Heron) hardware kernel; Nystr"om-QKE wins at saturating budgets on planted-sparse via low-rank reconstruction; ShoFaR is competitive only at extreme low budgets. Second, a closed-form pair-level acquisition theory: sijstar propto |gij|√Kij(1-Kij) with explicit gradient gij for KRR (Lemma~1, |βiαj+βjαi|√Kij(1-Kij)) and SVM via the envelope theorem (|ηi^*ηj^*|√Kij(1-Kij)); a corrected sparsity-aware Cauchy--Schwarz rate ρ ≤ 2m/N matching empirics (vs. the naive m2/N2); an explicit-constant plug-in regret bound (Theorem~2); and a tighter SVM ceiling ρSVM ≤ msv2/N2. We close with the first multi-seed live online adaptive shot allocation on quantum hardware: +17.0 ± 4.8 pts at N=20 on textttibmaachen (3.5σ, 5 seeds), with the advantage holding at N=30 at higher budget on textttibmberlin (+14.0 ± 8.5 pts, 5 seeds).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  2. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  3. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
  4. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
  5. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
  6. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  7. 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
  8. 2018Random Fourier Features for Kernel Ridge Regression: Approximation Bounds and Statistical Guaranteescited by 71
  9. 2018On Fast Leverage Score Sampling and Optimal Learningcited by 40
  10. 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Studycited by 22
  11. 2020Fourier Sparse Leverage Scores and Approximate Kernel Learningcited by 16
  12. 2018Distributed Adaptive Sampling for Kernel Matrix Approximationcited by 9
5 more
  1. 2022A kernel-based quantum random forest for improved classificationcited by 7
  2. 2023Improved Active Learning via Dependent Leverage Score Samplingcited by 6
  3. 2024Efficient Parameter Optimisation for Quantum Kernel Alignment: A Sub-sampling Approach in Variational Trainingcited by 6
  4. 2024In Search of Quantum Advantage: Estimating the Number of Shots in Quantum Kernel Methodscited by 6
  5. 2022Shot-frugal and Robust quantum kernel classifierscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.