AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budget
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating an N × N quantum kernel from circuit fidelities requires Theta(N2 S) measurement shots, the dominant bottleneck for deployment on near-term hardware. Existing budget-saving methods (Nystr"om-QKE, ShoFaR, kernel-target alignment) sub-sample which entries to measure but allocate shots uniformly within their chosen subset, ignoring how much each entry drives the downstream classifier. We close this gap with two contributions. First, a complete regime decomposition for shot-budgeted quantum kernel learning: a principled menu of when each allocator wins. Our method, AQKA, dominates the budget-limited regime (B lesssim 16 npairs) on sparse-sensitivity KRR, with the gap growing from +8 to +25 pts over uniform as N scales 225→1000 and reaching +26--32 pts on an textttibmpittsburgh (156-qubit Heron) hardware kernel; Nystr"om-QKE wins at saturating budgets on planted-sparse via low-rank reconstruction; ShoFaR is competitive only at extreme low budgets. Second, a closed-form pair-level acquisition theory: sijstar propto |gij|√Kij(1-Kij) with explicit gradient gij for KRR (Lemma~1, |βiαj+βjαi|√Kij(1-Kij)) and SVM via the envelope theorem (|ηi^*ηj^*|√Kij(1-Kij)); a corrected sparsity-aware Cauchy--Schwarz rate ρ ≤ 2m/N matching empirics (vs. the naive m2/N2); an explicit-constant plug-in regret bound (Theorem~2); and a tighter SVM ceiling ρSVM ≤ msv2/N2. We close with the first multi-seed live online adaptive shot allocation on quantum hardware: +17.0 ± 4.8 pts at N=20 on textttibmaachen (3.5σ, 5 seeds), with the advantage holding at N=30 at higher budget on textttibmberlin (+14.0 ± 8.5 pts, 5 seeds).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
- 2018Random Fourier Features for Kernel Ridge Regression: Approximation Bounds and Statistical Guaranteescited by 71
- 2018On Fast Leverage Score Sampling and Optimal Learningcited by 40
- 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Studycited by 22
- 2020Fourier Sparse Leverage Scores and Approximate Kernel Learningcited by 16
- 2018Distributed Adaptive Sampling for Kernel Matrix Approximationcited by 9
5 more
- 2022A kernel-based quantum random forest for improved classificationcited by 7
- 2023Improved Active Learning via Dependent Leverage Score Samplingcited by 6
- 2024Efficient Parameter Optimisation for Quantum Kernel Alignment: A Sub-sampling Approach in Variational Trainingcited by 6
- 2024In Search of Quantum Advantage: Estimating the Number of Shots in Quantum Kernel Methodscited by 6
- 2022Shot-frugal and Robust quantum kernel classifierscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Adaptive Measurement Allocation for Learning Kernelized SVMs Under Noisy Observationscited by 1
- 2026Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 1
- 2026Statevector-to-Hardware Reconstruction of a Four-Qubit ZZ Quantum Kernel: A Single-Backend Case Study of Three Execution Jobscited by 0
- 2026Statevector-to-Hardware Reconstruction of a Four-Qubit ZZ Quantum Kernel: A Single-Backend Case Study of Three Execution Jobs22 Jul 2026
- 2026Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition for Gaussian Process Regression27 Jun 2026
- 2026Adaptive Measurement Allocation for Learning Kernelized SVMs Under Noisy Observations21 May 2026