In Search of Quantum Advantage: Estimating the Number of Shots in Quantum Kernel Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has gathered significant attention through approaches like Quantum Kernel Machines. While these methods hold considerable promise, their quantum nature presents inherent challenges. One major challenge is the limited resolution of estimated kernel values caused by the finite number of circuit runs performed on a quantum device. In this study, we propose a comprehensive system of rules and heuristics for estimating the required number of circuit runs in quantum kernel methods. We introduce two critical effects that necessitate an increased measurement precision through additional circuit runs: the spread effect and the concentration effect. The effects are analyzed in the context of fidelity and projected quantum kernels. To address these phenomena, we develop an approach for estimating desired precision of kernel values, which, in turn, is translated into the number of circuit runs. Our methodology is validated through extensive numerical simulations, focusing on the problem of exponential value concentration. We stress that quantum kernel methods should not only be considered from the machine learning performance perspective, but also from the context of the resource consumption. The results provide insights into the possible benefits of quantum kernel methods, offering a guidance for their application in quantum machine learning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.
Builds on
12 of 56 references.
References · 12
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
- 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
- 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
- 2022Mixed Quantum-Classical Method For Fraud Detection with Quantum Feature Selectioncited by 15
- 2023Detecting Clouds in Multispectral Satellite Images Using Quantum-Kernel Support Vector Machinescited by 15
- 2023A Framework for Demonstrating Practical Quantum Advantage: Racing Quantum against Classical Generative Modelscited by 15
- 2022Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical datacited by 11
- 2022Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantagecited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Benchmarking quantum machine learning kernel training for classification taskscited by 10
- 2026AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budgetcited by 3
- 2025QuXAI: Explainers for Hybrid Quantum Machine Learning Modelscited by 2
- 2026Adaptive Measurement Allocation for Learning Kernelized SVMs Under Noisy Observationscited by 1
- 2025A Versatile Variational Quantum Kernel Framework for Non-Trivial Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Maritime object classification with SAR imagery using quantum kernel methodscited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Measurement Allocation for Learning Kernelized SVMs Under Noisy Observations21 May 2026
- 2026AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budget14 May 2026
- 2025Maritime object classification with SAR imagery using quantum kernel methods12 Dec 2025
- 2025A Versatile Variational Quantum Kernel Framework for Non-Trivial Classification13 Nov 2025
- 2025QuXAI: Explainers for Hybrid Quantum Machine Learning Models15 May 2025
- 2024Benchmarking quantum machine learning kernel training for classification tasks17 Aug 2024