mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prefix Teach, Suffix Fade: Local Teachability Collapse in Strong-to-Weak On-Policy Distillation

arXiv 2605.13643 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own rollouts using dense feedback from a stronger teacher. Prior literature suggests that, provided teacher feedback is available, supervising the full sequence of response tokens should monotonically improve performance. However, we demonstrate that this assumption sometimes fails to hold in strong-to-weak OPD settings. While later segments of a generated trajectory may still exhibit a non-zero teacher-student advantage, they frequently lack the local contrast that makes dense feedback effective for prioritizing student learning. We term this failure mode local teachability collapse. The resulting principle is straightforward: supervision should concentrate on trajectory regions where the teacher's feedback remains discriminative, rather than uniformly covering the entire response. We operationalize this principle through a trajectory-specific release rule. This rule measures the teacher's margin over the student's top-K candidate set, aggregates this margin across NLTK-tokenized sentence segments, and truncates dense OPD supervision upon detecting a BIC-style downward change point. Experimental results across strong-to-weak distillation tasks using the Qwen3 model family indicate that this release rule consistently outperforms standard full-trajectory OPD across five in-domain benchmarks at various student scales. Furthermore, compared to baseline distillation methods, our approach better preserves model capabilities on out-of-domain task. These results suggest that effective strong-to-weak OPD requires evaluating not only the availability of teacher guidance but also its local utility, ensuring that the generated feedback remains teachable.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

39 of 50 references.

References · 39

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  7. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  8. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  9. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  10. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  11. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  12. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 478
27 more
  1. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  2. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
  3. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 157
  4. 2026Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Modelscited by 151
  5. 2026A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 148
  6. 2026Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixescited by 122
  7. 2025Online Difficulty Filtering for Reasoning Oriented Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  8. 2025Black-Box On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 53
  9. 2026CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillationcited by 49
  10. 2025Can Prompt Difficulty be Online Predicted for Accelerating RL Finetuning of Reasoning Models?cited by 48
  11. 2026Fast and Effective On-policy Distillation from Reasoning Prefixescited by 43
  12. 2026Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipecited by 43
  13. 2026HDPO: Hybrid Distillation Policy Optimization via Privileged Self-Distillationcited by 39
  14. 2023Lion: Adversarial Distillation of Proprietary Large Language Modelscited by 33
  15. 2026Video-OPD: Efficient Post-Training of Multimodal Large Language Models for Temporal Video Grounding via On-Policy Distillationcited by 32
  16. 2026GATES: Self-Distillation under Privileged Context with Consensus Gatingcited by 30
  17. 2026Lightning OPD: Efficient Post-Training for Large Reasoning Models with Offline On-Policy Distillationcited by 28
  18. 2025VOLD: Reasoning Transfer from LLMs to Vision-Language Models via On-Policy Distillationcited by 26
  19. 2026Distribution-Aligned Sequence Distillation for Superior Long-CoT Reasoningcited by 13
  20. 2026X-OPD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Distillation for Capability Alignment in Speech LLMscited by 13
  21. 2026OVD: On-policy Verbal Distillationcited by 9
  22. 2025Where Did This Sentence Come From? Tracing Provenance in LLM Reasoning Distillationcited by 6
  23. 2025ORPO-Distill: Mixed-Policy Preference Optimization for Cross-Architecture LLM Distillationcited by 4
  24. 2026Learning from the Right Rollouts: Data Attribution for PPO-based LLM Post-Trainingcited by 4
  25. 2026On the Step Length Confounding in LLM Reasoning Data Selectioncited by 3
  26. 2026Making Expert Reasoning Learnable with Self-Distillationcited by 1
  27. 2026TMS: Trajectory-Mixed Supervision for Reward-Free, On-Policy SFTcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: