mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ergodic Trajectory Design by Learned Pushforward Maps: Provable Coverage via Conditional Flow Matching

arXiv 2605.13063 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing continuous trajectories whose time-averaged occupancy provably matches a prescribed spatial density (the ergodic coverage problem) is central to UAV-assisted data collection and sensing, robotic exploration, and mobile monitoring. For flying agents in particular, this challenge is acute: trajectories must balance coverage fidelity against tight energy budgets, no-fly zones, and acceleration limits. Existing methods either re-optimize each trajectory online (with cost growing in the horizon and re-running for every target, agent, and realization) or rely on bespoke analytical constructions that must be re-derived for each new constraint. We propose a epushforward framework that decouples ergodicity from density matching: an analytic latent trajectory provides exact uniform ergodicity on a simple annular domain, and a single map, learned offline by optimal-transport conditional flow matching, transports this latent occupancy onto the prescribed target density. The composed trajectory is then asymptotically ergodic with respect to the learned pushforward distribution, with deviation from the target controlled by the flow-matching training loss. Once trained for a given target density and constraint set, the map serves an unbounded number of trajectories and a multi-agent fleet without per-agent retraining, and many differentiable operational constraints (no-fly zones, acceleration ceilings, or fairness penalties) enter as additive soft penalties in the training loss without re-deriving the design. We prove three results (an acceleration-energy bound, an O(1/√K) ergodic convergence rate in the number of trajectory cycles K, and an approximation-error bound) that combine into an end-to-end coverage bound estimable from CFM training diagnostics (certified given an architectural Lipschitz bound on vθ).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 3 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Flow Matching Ergodic Coverage24 Apr

Other references · 2

  1. 2024Convergence of Continuous Normalizing Flows for Learning Probability Distributionscited by 24
  2. 2026Infinite-Horizon Ergodic Control via Kernel Mean Embeddingscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Belief-Conditioned One-Step Diffusion: Real-Time Trajectory Planning with Just-Enough Sensing
  2. 2026Guided Diffusion with Distilled Vision-Language Reliability for Aerial Navigation
  3. 2024Efficient Trajectory Forecasting and Generation with Conditional Flow Matching
  4. 2025Dense-Jump Flow Matching with Non-Uniform Time Scheduling for Robotic Policies: Mitigating Multi-Step Inference Degradation
  5. 2026Ergodic Imitation for Adaptive Exploration around Demonstrations
  6. 2025FlowMP: Learning Motion Fields for Robot Planning with Conditional Flow Matching
  7. 2026FlockDiffusion: Assignment-Conditioned Diffusion for Multi-Drone Task Allocation and Completion ↗
  8. 2024CGD: Constraint-Guided Diffusion Policies for UAV Trajectory Planning