PyroAdapt: Adapting Wildfire Prediction under Spatial Heterogeneity and Temporal Shift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prediction of wildfire occurrence is a rare-event problem compounded by spatial heterogeneity and temporal distribution shift, as fire occurrences are vastly outnumbered by non-occurrences, and predictor--fire relationship varies across space and time. Models trained on historical fire data may perform poorly under new conditions and require adaptation to the target distribution before operational use. We propose PyroAdapt, a pretrain--retrieve--rank framework that adapts a pretrained model to target conditions by retrieving historical locations with similar conditions and fine-tuning on the retrievals through risk ranking. For spatial adaptation, we condition risk on terrain, ecoregion embeddings, and fire rates, accounting for spatial context in the retrieval, and learn risk ordering from same-day fire--nonfire cell pairs. We compare direct ranking, residual pairwise DPO (RDPO), and selective ranking through a unified score-gap formulation that characterizes their gradient allocation. Over California (discretized into 666 0.25x0.25 grid cells), these objectives raise daily average precision from 21.62% for continued focal fine-tuning to 24.35--24.57%, and Top5% recall from 18.70% to 22.11--22.79%. Under a fixed daily detection budget of 34 cells (5% area), selective ranking captures 344 additional positive cell--days. For fires in the top 5%/10%/20% of dry matter consumption, selective ranking raises recall by 39.70/28.18/20.50 percentage points, respectively. Furthermore, rolling evaluations over Yosemite show that the gains from ranking persist under temporal distribution shift. Together, these results show that PyroAdapt prioritizes the most fire-prone locations under a daily budget constraint and detects more extreme fire events.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 62 references.
References · 15
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
- 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
- 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 788
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Probabilistic Approach to Wildfire Spread Prediction Using a Denoising Diffusion Surrogate Model
- 2025BCWildfire: A Long-term Multi-factor Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Boreal Wildfire Risk Prediction
- 2026N-Tree Diffusion for Long-Horizon Wildfire Risk Forecasting
- 2026Modular Deep Learning Mechanisms for Auditable Next-Day Wildfire Spread Prediction
- 2026Probabilistic Forecasting of Localized Wildfire Spread Based on Conditional Flow Matching
- 2026Robust Wildfire Forecasting under Partial Observability: From Reconstruction to Prediction ↗
- 2022An Emulation Framework for Fire Front Spread
- 2026Evaluating the Generalizability of Foundation Models for Extreme Environmental Events: Case Study of California Wildfire PM2.5