PreScam: A Benchmark for Predicting Scam Progression from Early Conversations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational scams, such as romance and investment scams, are emerging as a major form of online fraud. Unlike one-shot scam lures such as fake lottery or unpaid toll messages, they unfold through multi-turn conversations in which scammers gradually manipulate victims using evolving psychological techniques. However, existing research mainly focuses on static scam detection or synthetic scams, leaving open whether language models can understand how real-world scams progress over time. We introduce PreScam, a benchmark for modeling scam progression from early conversations. Built from user-submitted scam reports, PreScam filters and structures 177,989 raw reports into 11,573 conversational scam instances spanning 20 scam categories. Each instance is hierarchically structured according to the scam lifecycle defined by the proposed scam kill chain, and further annotated at the turn level with scammer psychological actions and victim responses. We benchmark models on two tasks: real-time termination prediction, which estimates whether a conversation is approaching the termination stage, and scammer action prediction, which forecasts the scammer's subsequent actions. Results show a clear gap between surface-level fluency and progression modeling: supervised encoders substantially outperform zero-shot LLMs on real-time termination prediction, while next-action prediction remains only moderately successful even for strong LLMs. Taken together, these results show that current models can capture some scam-related cues, yet still struggle to track how risk escalates and how manipulation unfolds across turns.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 56 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
- 2025Fraud-R1 : A Multi-Round Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of LLM Against Augmented Fraud and Phishing Inducementscited by 31
- 2023GraphPatcher: Mitigating Degree Bias for Graph Neural Networks via Test-time Augmentationcited by 29
- 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 29
- 2024Social Science Meets LLMs: How Reliable Are Large Language Models in Social Simulations?cited by 26
- 2024ChatSpamDetector: Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective Phishing Email Detectioncited by 25
- 2022Grape: Knowledge Graph Enhanced Passage Reader for Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 22
- 2026Why Reasoning Fails to Plan: A Planning-Centric Analysis of Long-Horizon Decision Making in LLM Agentscited by 22
- 2022Self-Supervised Graph Structure Refinement for Graph Neural Networkscited by 20
10 more
- 2024Measure-Observe-Remeasure: An Interactive Paradigm for Differentially-Private Exploratory Analysiscited by 19
- 2024PhishAgent: A Robust Multimodal Agent for Phishing Webpage Detectioncited by 16
- 2018The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Schemecited by 15
- 2025Personalized Attacks of Social Engineering in Multi-turn Conversations: LLM Agents for Simulation and Detectioncited by 13
- 2025TeleAntiFraud-28k: An Audio-Text Slow-Thinking Dataset for Telecom Fraud Detectioncited by 12
- 2019Cognitive Triaging of Phishing Attackscited by 8
- 2025PsyScam: A Benchmark for Psychological Techniques in Real-World Scamscited by 7
- 2016Dial One for Scam: A Large-Scale Analysis of Technical Support Scamscited by 6
- 2024An Explorative Study of Pig Butchering Scamscited by 4
- 2025Victim as a Service: Designing a System for Engaging with Interactive Scammerscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.