Crash Assessment via Mesh-Based Graph Neural Networks and Physics-Aware Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Full-vehicle crash simulations are computationally expensive, limiting their use in iterative design exploration. This work investigates learned hybrid surrogate models (MeshTransolver, MeshGeoTransolver, and MeshGeoFLARE) for predicting time-resolved structural deformation fields in an industrial lateral pole-impact benchmark. We evaluate whether neural surrogates can reproduce full-field crash kinematics with sufficient accuracy, spatial regularity, and structural plausibility for engineering interpretation. The proposed architectures combine local mesh message passing, geometry-aware global attention, and sparse contact-aware correction for autoregressive crash rollout. We compare mesh-based graph neural networks, attention-based geometric models, and hybrid architectures under a common training and hyperparameter configuration. The hybrid models capture both short-range structural interactions and long-range deformation patterns, while a sparse contact-aware variant assesses the effect of dynamic proximity interactions during rollout. On a 25-sample full-vehicle test set, the best hybrid model achieves a temporal mean root-mean-square error of 3.20 mm. While geometry-aware attention baselines are quantitatively competitive, qualitative side-view inspection shows they can introduce local spatial noise and deformation irregularities that complicate structural interpretation. In contrast, hybrid mesh-attention models provide the best balance between scalar accuracy, survival-space consistency, and physically interpretable displacement fields. These results suggest that crash surrogate assessment should combine global error metrics with downstream safety-relevant quantities and qualitative field inspection. The proposed methodology enables fast full-field predictions while preserving essential structural information for industrial crash-engineering analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
9 of 15 references.
References · 9
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 867
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
- 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 89
- 2025GeoTransolver: Learning Physics on Irregular Domains Using Multi-scale Geometry Aware Physics Attention Transformercited by 20
- 2025Automotive Crash Dynamics Modeling Accelerated with Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2026MeshGraphNet-Transformer: Scalable Mesh-based Learned Simulation for Solid Mechanicscited by 8
- 2025FLARE: Fast Low-rank Attention Routing Enginecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.