mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DiffScore: Text Evaluation Beyond Autoregressive Likelihood

arXiv 2605.11601 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoregressive language models are widely used for text evaluation, however, their left-to-right factorization introduces positional bias, i.e., early tokens are scored with only leftward context, conflating architectural asymmetry with true text quality. We propose masked reconstruction as an alternative paradigm, where every token is scored using full bidirectional context. We introduce DiffScore, an evaluation framework built on Masked Large Diffusion Language Models. By measuring text recoverability across continuous masking rates, DiffScore eliminates positional bias and naturally establishes an evaluation hierarchy from local fluency to global coherence. We further provide diagnostic tools unavailable to autoregressive frameworks: multi-timestep quality profiles that decompose scores across masking rates, and bidirectional PMI decomposition that disentangles fluency from faithfulness. Experiments across ten benchmarks show that DiffScore consistently outperforms autoregressive baselines in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. The code is released at: https://github.com/wenlai-lavine/DiffScore.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2025Large Language Diffusion Modelscited by 912
  5. 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 848
  6. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  7. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  8. 2025Dream 7B: Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 544
  9. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
  10. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
  11. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  12. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
7 more
  1. 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 294
  2. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
  3. 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
  4. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  5. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  6. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 155
  7. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 145

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rate-Resolved Text Evaluation with Masked Diffusion Language Models
  2. 2026Autoregressive vs. Masked Diffusion Language Models: A Controlled Comparison
  3. 2025Anchored Diffusion Language Model
  4. 2024Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines
  5. 2026Differences in Text Generated by Diffusion and Autoregressive Language Models
  6. 2024Scaling up Masked Diffusion Models on Text
  7. 2026Diffutron: A Masked Diffusion Language Model for Turkish Language
  8. 2024Beyond Autoregression: Fast LLMs via Self-Distillation Through Time