mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Multi-Agent Path Finding under Observation Attacks: A Principled Adversarial-Plus-Smoothing Training Recipe

arXiv 2605.11469 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized multi-agent path finding (MAPF) routes a team of agents on a shared grid, each acting from its own local view. The standard solution trains one shared neural policy with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a popular on-policy reinforcement learning algorithm. Such a policy works well on clean observations, but a small input perturbation on one agent often changes its action, which then blocks a neighbour, and the team jams. In this paper we present two training recipes that keep the same network and the same deployment loop, yet make the policy hold up under perturbed observations. The first recipe, Adv-PPO, trains the shared policy against worst-case perturbations of its own input and selects the checkpoint by performance under adversarial perturbation. The second recipe, Adv-PPO+MACER, fine-tunes that checkpoint with a small on-policy smoothness term whose gradient follows the certified radius of randomized smoothing. On POGEMA with 8x8 maps and four agents, the unprotected PPO policy reaches 95.8% clean success but only 2.5% under the strongest attack. Adv-PPO recovers worst-case success to 59.2% at one percentage point of clean cost. Adv-PPO+MACER recovers it to 77.5% +/- 6.0% across three independent seeds at less than one percentage point of clean cost. We support these numbers with per-attack curves, a certified action-stability sanity check (which measures the smoothed-policy wrapper, not the deployed argmax policy), and side-by-side rollout storyboards that show the failure mode and the fix inside one environment instance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 19 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  6. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
  7. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 238
  8. 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 214
  9. 2019Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarkscited by 199
  10. 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 174
  11. 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
  12. 2018PRIMAL: Pathfinding via Reinforcement and Imitation Multi-Agent Learningcited by 90
1 more
  1. 2023Learn to Follow: Decentralized Lifelong Multi-agent Pathfinding via Planning and Learningcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Robust and Diverse Multi-Agent Learning via Rational Policy Gradient
  2. 2024Learning Coordinated Maneuver in Adversarial Environments ↗
  3. 2024MAPF-GPT: Imitation Learning for Multi-Agent Pathfinding at Scale
  4. 2025SIGMA: Sheaf-Informed Geometric Multi-Agent Pathfinding
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning for Large-Scale Lifelong Multi-Agent Path Finding with Shared Spatial Fields
  6. 2026Decentralized Master-Mind: Joint Action Refinement through Iterative Intent Denoising in Multi-Agent Pathfinding
  7. 2026Learning to Communicate Locally for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Pathfinding
  8. 2025Multi-Agent Path Finding via Offline RL and LLM Collaboration