mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative AI for Visualizing Highway Construction Hazards Through Synthetic Images and Temporal Sequences

arXiv 2605.11276 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Highway construction workers face a high risk of serious injury or death. Image-based training materials depicting hazardous scenarios are essential for engaging safety instruction but remain scarce due to ethical and logistical barriers. This study develops and evaluates a generative AI methodology for producing synthetic visualizations of highway construction hazards from OSHA Severe Injury Report narratives. Two modes were developed: a single-pass approach yielding one image per incident, and a temporal approach producing a four-stage sequence. A sample of 75 incident records yielded 750 images, evaluated using CLIP-based semantic retrieval and expert assessment across dimensions such as educational utility, fidelity, and alignment. Single-pass images achieved 81.1% educational acceptability with fidelity and alignment scores of 4.14/5 and 4.07/5, respectively, while temporal sequences achieved 60.9% acceptability with comparable alignment (3.94/5) but lower fidelity (3.51/5). CLIP-based retrieval revealed that both modes produce images with statistically significant retrieval capabilities. This is among the first studies to leverage modern autoregressive image generation models for visualizing construction hazards from reported severe injuries and to generate temporally sequenced hazard imagery, and a new multi-dimensional evaluation framework was developed to support future research in this domain. The work enables safety trainers to pair narrative storytelling with visual learning material without photographing real-world hazards, and the framework could be applied to datasets across diverse domains, enabling synthetic image generation tailored to new application areas.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 54 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  3. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
  4. 2023Toward Verifiable and Reproducible Human Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 66
  5. 2024TICKing All the Boxes: Generated Checklists Improve LLM Evaluation and Generationcited by 62
  6. 2025Exploring the Impact of Temperature on Large Language Models:Hot or Cold?cited by 40
  7. 2025Is Nano Banana Pro a Low-Level Vision All-Rounder? A Comprehensive Evaluation on 14 Tasks and 40 Datasetscited by 19
  8. 2025Test-time Prompt Refinement for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 16
  9. 2025Using Vision Language Models for Safety Hazard Identification in Constructioncited by 12
  10. 2025Iterative Prompt Refinement for Safer Text-to-Image Generationcited by 6
  11. 2025Deterministic Image-to-Image Translation via Denoising Brownian Bridge Models with Dual Approximatorscited by 5
  12. 2025Prompt to Protection: A Comparative Study of Multimodal LLMs in Construction Hazard Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.