Backbone-Equated Diffusion OOD via Sparse Internal Snapshots
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fair comparison between diffusion-based OOD detectors is challenging, as conclusions can vary with backbone choice, corruption parameterization, and test-time budget. We address this issue through a Mutualized Backbone-Equated (MBE) protocol that aligns canonical corruption levels and logical test-time cost across diffusion backbones. Within this setting, we introduce Canonical Feature Snapshots (CFS), a family of detectors that probes a frozen diffusion backbone using only a tiny number of native internal activations at canonical low-noise levels. On a controlled CIFAR-scale benchmark, the strongest one-forward CFS variant is CFS(1x2), while an even smaller decoder-only variant remains highly competitive. This shows that much of the relative-OOD signal exposed by frozen diffusion backbones is concentrated in a small number of sparse internal states, rather than requiring full denoising trajectories or high-capacity downstream heads. We further provide a local diagnostic theory explaining these observations through conditional encoder-decoder complementarity, diagonal-score separation, and low-noise corruption stability. The official implementation is available at https://github.com/RouzAY/cfs-diffusion-ood/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 28 references.
References · 26
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 2,994
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 666
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
- 2023Diffusion Hyperfeatures: Searching Through Time and Space for Semantic Correspondencecited by 211
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
14 more
- 2022Denoising diffusion models for out-of-distribution detectioncited by 102
- 2023Diffusion Model as Representation Learnercited by 95
- 2023Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection with Diffusion Inpaintingcited by 57
- 2020Multiscale Score Matching for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 36
- 2023Faster Diffusion: Rethinking the Role of the Encoder for Diffusion Model Inferencecited by 33
- 2023DiffGuard: Semantic Mismatch-Guided Out-of-Distribution Detection using Pre-trained Diffusion Modelscited by 25
- 2024Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Task-Oriented Survey of Recent Advancescited by 24
- 2024Out-of-Distribution Detection with a Single Unconditional Diffusion Modelcited by 22
- 2023Likelihood-based Out-of-Distribution Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 10
- 2025Revisiting Likelihood-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection by Modeling Representationscited by 6
- 2024Diffusion-based Layer-wise Semantic Reconstruction for Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 5
- 2025SCOPED: Score-Curvature Out-of-distribution Proximity Evaluator for Diffusioncited by 3
- 2025Probability Density from Latent Diffusion Models for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 2
- 2026GEPC: Group-Equivariant Posterior Consistency for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Diffusion Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.