Switching-Geometry Analysis of Deflated Q-Value Iteration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper develops a joint spectral radius (JSR) framework for analyzing rank-one deflated Q-value iteration (Q-VI) in discounted Markov decision process control. Focusing on an all-ones residual correction, we interpret the resulting algorithm through the geometry of switching systems and, to the best of our knowledge, give the first JSR-based convergence analysis of deflated Q-VI for policy optimization problems. Our analysis reveals that the standard Q-VI switching system model has JSR exactly the discount factor γ∈ (0,1), since all admissible subsystems share the all-ones vector as an invariant direction. By passing to the quotient space that removes this direction, we obtain a projected switching system model whose JSR governs the relevant error dynamics and may be strictly smaller than γ. Therefore, the deflated Q-VI admits a potentially sharper convergence-rate characterization than the ambient-space γ-bound. Finally, we prove that the correction is equivalent to a scalar recentering of standard Q-VI. Hence, the projected trajectory, and therefore the greedy-policy sequence, is unchanged relative to standard Q-VI initialized from the same point. The benefit of deflation is not a change in the induced decision-making problem, but a more precise JSR-based description of the convergence geometry after the redundant all-ones component is removed.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
5 of 19 references.
References · 5
- 2019A First-Order Approach To Accelerated Value Iterationcited by 17
- 2026Switching Theory for Q-Learningcited by 7
- 2024Deflated Dynamics Value Iterationcited by 5
- 2025Rank-One Modified Value Iterationcited by 3
- 2026Beyond the Bellman Fixed Point: Geometry and Fast Policy Identification in Value Iterationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Heavy-Ball Q-Learning with Residual Weighting Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Heavy-Ball Q-Learning with Residual Weighting Correction25 Jun 2026