mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Interpretable Machine Learning for Football Performance Analysis: Evidence of Limited Transferability from Elite Leagues to University Competition

arXiv 2605.10796 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has become increasingly prevalent in football performance analysis, yet most studies prioritize predictive accuracy while implicitly assuming that learned performance determinants and their interpretations are transferable across competition levels. Whether interpretability remains reliable under domain shift-from elite to university football remains largely unexplored. This study investigates whether performance determinants learned from elite competitions are structurally transferable to university-level football and whether their interpretations remain robust under domain shift. Models were trained on large-scale event data from the top five European leagues and applied to university football data from National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) using an identical feature space. Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron models were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Counterfactual Impact Score (CIS). Across five experiments, elite football exhibited a stable and consistent hierarchy of performance determinants across leagues, models, and explanation methods. In contrast, NTHU university football showed substantial reordering of key indicators, reduced explanation stability, weaker structural agreement with elite domains, and increased sensitivity to explanation method. These findings suggest that interpretability robustness is domain-dependent. Rather than reflecting methodological limitations alone, instability in explanations under domain shift may serve as a diagnostic signal of structural ambiguity in the target domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

7 of 39 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,143
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,455
  4. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 645
  5. 2018Actions Speak Louder Than Goals: Valuing Player Actions in Soccercited by 90
  6. 2023A Machine Learning Approach for Player and Position Adjusted Expected Goals in Football (Soccer)cited by 7
  7. 2023Glocal Explanations of Expected Goal Models in Soccercited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.