Multi-layer attentive probing improves transfer of audio representations for bioacoustics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Probing heads map the representations learned from audio by a machine learning model to downstream task labels and are a key component in evaluating representation learning. Most bioacoustic benchmarks use a fixed, low-capacity probe, such as a linear layer on the final encoder layer. While this standardization enables model comparisons, it may bias results by overlooking the interaction between encoder features and probe design. In this work, we systematically study different probing strategies across two bioacoustic benchmarks, BEANs and BirdSet. We evaluate last- and multi-layer probing, across linear and attention probes. We show that larger probe heads that leverage time information have superior performance. Our results suggest that current benchmarks may misrepresent encoder quality when relying on a last-layer probing setup. Multi-layer probing improves downstream task performance across all tested models, while attention probing has superior performance to linear probing for transformer models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 23 references.
References · 19
- 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
- 2022BEATs: Audio Pre-Training with Acoustic Tokenizerscited by 388
- 2021Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmapcited by 78
- 2022SUPERB-SG: Enhanced Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark for Semantic and Generative Capabilitiescited by 77
- 2023ML-SUPERB: Multilingual Speech Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 71
- 2022AVES: Animal Vocalization Encoder based on Self-Supervisioncited by 53
- 2024EAT: Self-Supervised Pre-Training with Efficient Audio Transformercited by 53
- 2023Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classificationcited by 51
- 2022BEANS: The Benchmark of Animal Soundscited by 38
- 2024BirdSet: A Large-Scale Dataset for Audio Classification in Avian Bioacousticscited by 36
- 2024NatureLM-audio: an Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacousticscited by 33
- 2024ML-SUPERB 2.0: Benchmarking Multilingual Speech Models Across Modeling Constraints, Languages, and Datasetscited by 27
7 more
- 2025Can Masked Autoencoders Also Listen to Birds?cited by 26
- 2025Perch 2.0: The Bittern Lesson for Bioacousticscited by 26
- 2023BIRB: A Generalization Benchmark for Information Retrieval in Bioacousticscited by 19
- 2023Speech Self-Supervised Representations Benchmarking: a Case for Larger Probing Headscited by 17
- 2025Comparing Self-Supervised Learning Models Pre-Trained on Human Speech and Animal Vocalizations for Bioacoustics Processingcited by 9
- 2025Robust detection of overlapping bioacoustic sound eventscited by 4
- 2025Crossing the Species Divide: Transfer Learning from Speech to Animal Soundscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.