Generalization Error Bounds for Picard-Type Operator Learning in Nonlinear Parabolic PDEs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Operator learning for partial differential equations (PDEs) aims to learn solution operators on infinite-dimensional function spaces from finite-resolution data. In this setting, it is important for the learned model to be discretization-invariant, or resolution-robust, and to reflect PDE-specific structure. It is therefore natural to ask how such structure should be encoded in the model architecture, hypothesis class, or learning procedure. In this paper, we study operator learning for solution operators of nonlinear parabolic PDEs based on Duhamel--Picard iteration. We formulate Picard iteration as an abstract state-transition model and present a theoretical framework for Picard-type operator learning. We derive implementation-agnostic generalization error bounds that separate the implementation error from the estimation error associated with the abstract state-transition model induced by Picard iteration. A key consequence is that increasing the Picard depth reduces the Picard truncation error without causing an unbounded growth of the entropy-based estimation error. We also extend the analysis to long-time prediction by rolling out the same learned local model over successive time blocks. Finally, we illustrate the theory for nonlinear heat equations on the torus using a Picard-type Fourier neural operator as a concrete implementation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
29 of 64 references.
References · 29
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 574
- 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 258
- 2021Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equationscited by 234
- 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 233
- 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 216
- 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 142
- 2024Operator Learning: Algorithms and Analysiscited by 85
- 2021Exponential Convergence of Deep Operator Networks for Elliptic Partial Differential Equationscited by 44
17 more
- 2023Operator learning with PCA-Net: upper and lower complexity boundscited by 44
- 2023Nonlocality and Nonlinearity Implies Universality in Operator Learningcited by 43
- 2023Out-of-distributional risk bounds for neural operators with applications to the Helmholtz equationcited by 32
- 2023Neural Operator Learning for Long-Time Integration in Dynamical Systems with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 32
- 2023The Parametric Complexity of Operator Learningcited by 28
- 2024Data Complexity Estimates for Operator Learningcited by 26
- 2023Deep Operator Network Approximation Rates for Lipschitz Operatorscited by 24
- 2022Neural and spectral operator surrogates: unified construction and expression rate boundscited by 21
- 2023Deep Equilibrium Based Neural Operators for Steady-State PDEscited by 19
- 2023Deep Operator Learning Lessens the Curse of Dimensionality for PDEscited by 18
- 2022Bounding the Rademacher Complexity of Fourier neural operatorscited by 16
- 2024Optimal deep learning of holomorphic operators between Banach spacescited by 12
- 2022Towards Size-Independent Generalization Bounds for Deep Operator Netscited by 6
- 2024Quantitative Approximation for Neural Operators in Nonlinear Parabolic Equationscited by 5
- 2024Polynomial Scaling is Possible For Neural Operator Approximations of Structured Families of BSDEscited by 2
- 2021Iterative regularization for constrained minimization formulations of nonlinear inverse problemscited by 1
- 2023Bi-level iterative regularization for inverse problems in nonlinear PDEscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.