mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Equilibrium Based Neural Operators for Steady-State PDEs

arXiv 2312.00234 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven machine learning approaches are being increasingly used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs). They have shown particularly striking successes when training an operator, which takes as input a PDE in some family, and outputs its solution. However, the architectural design space, especially given structural knowledge of the PDE family of interest, is still poorly understood. We seek to remedy this gap by studying the benefits of weight-tied neural network architectures for steady-state PDEs. To achieve this, we first demonstrate that the solution of most steady-state PDEs can be expressed as a fixed point of a non-linear operator. Motivated by this observation, we propose FNO-DEQ, a deep equilibrium variant of the FNO architecture that directly solves for the solution of a steady-state PDE as the infinite-depth fixed point of an implicit operator layer using a black-box root solver and differentiates analytically through this fixed point resulting in O(1) training memory. Our experiments indicate that FNO-DEQ-based architectures outperform FNO-based baselines with 4× the number of parameters in predicting the solution to steady-state PDEs such as Darcy Flow and steady-state incompressible Navier-Stokes. Finally, we show FNO-DEQ is more robust when trained with datasets with more noisy observations than the FNO-based baselines, demonstrating the benefits of using appropriate inductive biases in architectural design for different neural network based PDE solvers. Further, we show a universal approximation result that demonstrates that FNO-DEQ can approximate the solution to any steady-state PDE that can be written as a fixed point equation.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  4. 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
  5. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  6. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 427
  7. 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 414
  8. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  9. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 336
  10. 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 283
  11. 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 258
  12. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 249
13 more
  1. 2020Monotone operator equilibrium networkscited by 100
  2. 2021JFB: Jacobian-Free Backpropagation for Implicit Networkscited by 86
  3. 2019Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guaranteescited by 77
  4. 2021On Training Implicit Modelscited by 75
  5. 2018Reviving and Improving Recurrent Back-Propagationcited by 69
  6. 2020A physics-informed operator regression framework for extracting data-driven continuum modelscited by 60
  7. 2020Lipschitz Bounded Equilibrium Networkscited by 49
  8. 2022Learning to correct spectral methods for simulating turbulent flowscited by 49
  9. 2022Mitigating spectral bias for the multiscale operator learningcited by 44
  10. 2022Path Independent Equilibrium Models Can Better Exploit Test-Time Computationcited by 38
  11. 2021On the Representation of Solutions to Elliptic PDEs in Barron Spacescited by 25
  12. 2021Parametric Complexity Bounds for Approximating PDEs with Neural Networkscited by 19
  13. 2022Neural Network Approximations of PDEs Beyond Linearity: A Representational Perspectivecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2025CodePDE: An Inference Framework for LLM-driven PDE Solver Generationcited by 39
  2. 2024On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEscited by 31
  3. 2024UPS: Efficiently Building Foundation Models for PDE Solving via Cross-Modal Adaptationcited by 27
  4. 2024Toward a Better Understanding of Fourier Neural Operators from a Spectral Perspectivecited by 25
  5. 2025HyPINO: Multi-Physics Neural Operators via HyperPINNs and the Method of Manufactured Solutionscited by 8
  6. 2025Generative Neural Operators of Log-Complexity Can Simultaneously Solve Infinitely Many Convex Programscited by 7
  7. 2024Quantitative Approximation for Neural Operators in Nonlinear Parabolic Equationscited by 5
  8. 2025Self-composing neural operators for high-frequency and multiscale PDE surrogatescited by 3
  9. 2024Polynomial Scaling is Possible For Neural Operator Approximations of Structured Families of BSDEscited by 2
  10. 2024Certified Robustness for Deep Equilibrium Models via Serialized Random Smoothingcited by 2
  11. 2026Lipschitz Multiscale Deep Equilibrium Models: A Theoretically Guaranteed and Accelerated Approachcited by 1
  12. 2026Bifurcation Models: Learning Set-Valued Solution Maps with Weight-Tied Dynamicscited by 1
7 more
  1. 2026The Kuramoto Neural Operator: Learning to Solve PDEs via Coupled Oscillator Dynamicscited by 1
  2. 2026Response Renormalization for Critical Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 1
  3. 2026NewPINNs: Physics-Informing Neural Networks Using Conventional Solvers for Partial Differential Equationscited by 0
  4. 2026Generalization Error Bounds for Picard-Type Operator Learning in Nonlinear Parabolic PDEscited by 0
  5. 2026Drifting Models for Surrogate Flow Modelingcited by 0
  6. 2026Why Directly Learning Periodic Trajectories Can Failcited by 0
  7. 2026Beyond Simulation: Retain-and-Repair Neural Operators for Real-World Adaptationcited by 0