The Benefits of Temporal Correlations: SGD Learns k-Juntas from Random Walks Efficiently
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study how temporal correlations in the data can make certain sparse learning problems efficiently learnable by gradient-based methods. Our focus is on Boolean k-juntas, a canonical sparse learning problem known to pose barriers for gradient-based methods under independent uniform samples. We show that this picture changes when the samples are generated by a lazy random walk on the hypercube. In this setting, the temporal dependencies can be exploited by a two-layer ReLU network trained using stylized-SGD with a temporal-difference loss, which compares target and predicted increments across consecutive samples. For every fixed k, the resulting sample complexity is essentially linear in the ambient dimension d. By contrast, we show that for large-batch gradient methods using standard convex pointwise losses, temporal correlations do not provide the same advantage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
31 of 46 references.
References · 31
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 184
- 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
- 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 142
- 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 141
- 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
- 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
- 2022Learning Single-Index Models with Shallow Neural Networkscited by 92
- 2022Wild-Time: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shift over Timecited by 85
- 2020Deep Equals Shallow for ReLU Networks in Kernel Regimescited by 83
19 more
- 2017Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learningcited by 79
- 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 77
- 2023Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculumcited by 73
- 2018On Markov Chain Gradient Descentcited by 63
- 2024The Benefits of Reusing Batches for Gradient Descent in Two-Layer Networks: Breaking the Curse of Information and Leap Exponentscited by 50
- 2021Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernelscited by 41
- 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent under Markovian Sampling Schemescited by 37
- 2023SGD Finds then Tunes Features in Two-Layer Neural Networks with near-Optimal Sample Complexity: A Case Study in the XOR problemcited by 36
- 2020Poly-time universality and limitations of deep learningcited by 23
- 2023Provable Advantage of Curriculum Learning on Parity Targets with Mixed Inputscited by 22
- 2023A Mathematical Model for Curriculum Learning for Paritiescited by 19
- 2024Progressive distillation induces an implicit curriculumcited by 15
- 2014Learning graphical models from the Glauber dynamicscited by 14
- 2024On the Complexity of Learning Sparse Functions with Statistical and Gradient Queriescited by 13
- 2024Bypassing the Noisy Parity Barrier: Learning Higher-Order Markov Random Fields from Dynamicscited by 8
- 2025Low-dimensional Functions are Efficiently Learnable under Randomly Biased Distributionscited by 8
- 2024Matching the Statistical Query Lower Bound for k-Sparse Parity Problems with Sign Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 7
- 2024Deep video representation learning: a surveycited by 4
- 2026Positive Distribution Shift as a Framework for Understanding Tractable Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.