Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Why does full-pipeline FP4 training of large language models often diverge, even when forward activations and activation gradients remain stable? We address this question through a controlled study of MXFP4 quantization in transformer training, progressively enabling FP4 across forward propagation (Fprop), activation gradients (Dgrad), and weight gradients (Wgrad) while holding all other factors fixed. In full pretraining of Llama 3.1-8B on the C4 dataset, we observe that quantizing Wgrad is the primary driver of convergence degradation, whereas FP4 in Fprop and Dgrad alone introduces only modest additional token requirements. To interpret this behavior, we evaluate both structured and stochastic interventions under a controlled experimental setting. We find that stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard rotations fail to stabilize training once Wgrad is quantized, whereas deterministic Hadamard rotations consistently restore stable optimization. These results suggest that FP4 training instability is driven by structured micro-scaling errors along sensitive gradient paths, rather than by insufficient stochasticity. We run experiments with native MXFP4 support on AMD Instinct MI355X GPUs, enabling controlled investigation of these effects without reliance on software emulation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
9 of 10 references.
References · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Outlier Suppression: Pushing the Limit of Low-bit Transformer Language Modelscited by 181
- 2023Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learningcited by 152
- 2025Pretraining Large Language Models with NVFP4cited by 76
- 2023LLM-FP4: 4-Bit Floating-Point Quantized Transformerscited by 69
- 2025Optimizing Large Language Model Training Using FP4 Quantizationcited by 56
- 2025FP4 All the Way: Fully Quantized Training of LLMscited by 40
- 2025Towards Efficient Pre-training: Exploring FP4 Precision in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026Diagnosing FP4 inference: a layer-wise and block-wise sensitivity analysis of NVFP4 and MXFP4cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026UE5M3 FP4 Block Scaling for Stable Language Model Pretrainingcited by 2
- 2026QATFactory: A Versatile, Deployment-Aligned Framework for Quantization-aware Training and Distillation of LLMscited by 1
- 2026Auditing Invisible Weight Updates with Reference Tracescited by 0
- 2026One QK Channel, Many Sources: Tracing Low-Precision Attention Collapsecited by 0
- 2026Format-Aware Fusion for Fast FP4 Pretrainingcited by 0
- 2026QATFactory: A Versatile, Deployment-Aligned Framework for Quantization-aware Training and Distillation of LLMs30 Sep 2026
- 2026Format-Aware Fusion for Fast FP4 Pretraining4 Sep 2026
- 2026UE5M3 FP4 Block Scaling for Stable Language Model Pretraining2 Sep 2026
- 2026One QK Channel, Many Sources: Tracing Low-Precision Attention Collapse3 Aug 2026
- 2026Auditing Invisible Weight Updates with Reference Traces9 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026FOCUS: FP4 Optimization via Coupled-Relaxation and Dual-Granularity Scaling
- 2025Block Rotation is All You Need for MXFP4 Quantization
- 2026Stable FP4 Training via Transposition-Invariant Block Quantization
- 2025Elucidating the Design Space of FP4 training
- 2026QuantForge: Discovering Residual Decompositions for MXFP4 Post-Training Quantization
- 2026TORQ: Two-Level Orthogonal Rotation for MXFP4 Quantization
- 2025Bridging the Gap Between Promise and Performance for Microscaling FP4 Quantization
- 2023Understanding INT4 Quantization for Transformer Models: Latency Speedup, Composability, and Failure Cases