ConFit v3: Improving Resume-Job Matching with LLM-based Re-Ranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A reliable resume-job matching system helps a company find suitable candidates from a pool of resumes and helps a job seeker find relevant jobs from a list of job posts. While recent advances in embedding-based methods such as ConFit and ConFit v2 can efficiently retrieve candidates at scale, the lack of controllability and explainability limits their real-world adaptations. LLM-based re-rankers can address these limitations through reasoning, but existing training recipes are developed on short-document benchmarks and do not account for noise in real-world recruiting data. In this work, we first conduct a systematic analysis over the LLM re-ranker training pipeline for person-job fit, covering inference algorithm design, RL algorithm selection, data processing, and SFT distillation. We find that using multi-pass re-ranking, training with listwise RL objectives, removing noisy samples, and distilling from a stronger LLM before RL significantly improves re-ranking performance. We then aggregate these findings to train ConFit v3 with Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-32B on real-world person-job fit datasets, and find significant improvements over existing best person-job fit systems as well as strong LLMs such as GPT-5 and Claude Opus-4.5. We hope our findings provide useful insights for future research on adapting LLM-based re-rankers to person-job fit systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 49 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 510
- 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
- 2025SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolutioncited by 246
- 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 151
- 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 130
8 more
- 2025Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
- 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 53
- 2018Enhancing Person-Job Fit for Talent Recruitment: An Ability-aware Neural Network Approachcited by 37
- 2020Learning to Match Jobs with Resumes from Sparse Interaction Data using Multi-View Co-Teaching Networkcited by 23
- 2020Learning Effective Representations for Person-Job Fit by Feature Fusioncited by 16
- 2025Shifting Perspectives: Steering Vectors for Robust Bias Mitigation in LLMscited by 13
- 2025Dyna-Mind: Learning to Simulate from Experience for Better AI Agentscited by 7
- 2025ConFit v2: Improving Resume-Job Matching using Hypothetical Resume Embedding and Runner-Up Hard-Negative Miningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.