Low-Cost Neural Radiance Fields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) achieve high-quality novel-view synthesis, but their long training times and reliance on dense input views limit accessibility. We present a comparative study of three accelerated NeRF variants - DS-NeRF, TensoRF, and HashNeRF and explore extensions targeted at the low-compute, low-data regime. First, we add a depth-supervision loss derived from COLMAP keypoints to TensoRF (TensoRF-DS) and evaluate it on the LLFF dataset under reduced view counts. Second, we ablate the feature-decoding MLP of TensoRF and study the effect of input downsampling on PSNR and runtime on the synthetic Lego scene. Third, we propose four architectural variants of the HashNeRF color and density networks, including residual and convolutional designs, and report PSNR/training-time tradeoffs under matched iteration budgets. Under iso-time evaluation, none of our extensions conclusively outperform the published baselines, but the experiments characterize which extensions transfer to constrained settings and surface design questions for future work.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
3 of 7 references.
References · 3
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
- 2022TensoRF: Tensorial Radiance Fieldscited by 1,280
- 2021Depth-supervised NeRF: Fewer Views and Faster Training for Freecited by 735
Built on by
Not cited yet.