mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MC2: Monte Carlo Correction for Fast Elliptic PDE Solving

arXiv 2605.09288 ↗First posted 10 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin scientific computing, but real-world deployment is bounded by compute. Classical Monte Carlo solvers such as Walk-on-Spheres (WoS) are unbiased and geometry-agnostic but are slow. Learned solvers are fast but biased and brittle under distribution shift. We present MC2, a hybrid WoS-Neural Network (WoS-NN) PDE solver that treats a low-budget Monte Carlo solution as a structured estimator of the true field and learns a single-pass neural correction to recover a high-fidelity solution. MC2 matches the accuracy of solutions using over 1000× more Monte Carlo compute, outperforming all evaluated classical, denoising, and neural-operator baselines. To enable reproducible study of finite-compute PDE solving, we additionally release PDEZoo, the largest standardized elliptic PDE benchmark to date: 2M PDEs spanning five elliptic families and unlimited geometric compositions, with analytic ground truth and multi-budget Monte Carlo trajectories. Together MC2 and PDEZoo (1) empirically establish that finite-sample Monte Carlo error is structured, learnable, and correctable in a single forward pass, (2) show that we can solve PDEs ~1000x faster than with just WoS, and (3) provide the evaluation infrastructure the field has so far lacked.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  4. 2022Denoising Diffusion Restoration Modelscited by 951
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  6. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  7. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  8. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  9. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
  10. 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 190
  11. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 186
  12. 2017A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometriescited by 122
7 more
  1. 2024DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving Under Partial Observationcited by 100
  2. 2023CoCoGen: Physically-Consistent and Conditioned Score-based Generative Models for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 54
  3. 2022SUNet: Swin Transformer UNet for Image Denoisingcited by 43
  4. 2022Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditionscited by 33
  5. 2022Grid-Free Monte Carlo for PDEs with Spatially Varying Coefficientscited by 12
  6. 2023Walk on Stars: A Grid-Free Monte Carlo Method for PDEs with Neumann Boundary Conditionscited by 8
  7. 2023A Practical Walk-on-Boundary Method for Boundary Value Problemscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.