Max-pooling Network Revisited: Analyzing the Role of Semantic Probability in Multiple Instance Learning for Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucination detection has become increasingly important for improving the reliability of large language models (LLMs). Recently, hybrid approaches such as HaMI, which combine semantic consistency with internal model states via Multiple Instance Learning (MIL), have achieved state-of-the-art performance. However, these methods incur substantial computational overhead due to repeated sampling and costly semantic similarity computations. In this work, we first provide a theoretical analysis of HaMI in terms of decision margins, revealing that scaling internal states with semantic consistency leads to an enlarged decision margin. Motivated by this insight, we revisit classical sentence classification models from a margin enlargement perspective, aggregating token-level features via max pooling and directly estimating sentence scores using a lightweight MLP. Without requiring semantic consistency computations, our approach achieves substantial efficiency improvements while maintaining competitive performance with state-of-the-art baselines through adaptive aggregation of internal feature representations. Code is available at https://github.com/FUJI1229/Hallucination_Detection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
14 more
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 378
- 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 349
- 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 253
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
- 2016Multiple Instance Learning: A Survey of Problem Characteristics and Applicationscited by 163
- 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 141
- 2023Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?cited by 54
- 2025Robust Hallucination Detection in LLMs via Adaptive Token Selectioncited by 19
- 2025H-Neurons: On the Existence, Impact, and Origin of Hallucination-Associated Neurons in LLMscited by 19
- 2025Too Consistent to Detect: A Study of Self-Consistent Errors in LLMscited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.