A Deep Risk Estimator for Known Operator Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We describe an approach for estimating the statistical risk of deep networks that contain a mix of learned and known operators. Building on the maximal training error bounds previously established for known operator learning, we derive a deep risk estimator that connects the expected error of a layered network to the size of the training sample. The estimator decomposes the total risk into a sum over learned layers; every known operator contributes zero to this sum, while every learned layer adds an approximation term inspired by Barron's classic work and an estimation term that decreases with the number of training samples. We are able to show that the bound shrinks whenever a learned layer is replaced by a known operator and that the corresponding sample requirement scales with the number of trainable parameters of the layer that is replaced. As an application, we use computed tomography as an example and compare an operator-aware filtered backprojection network with a fully connected substitute that collapses the entire reconstruction pipeline into a single learned dense matrix. The predicted parameter ratio coincides with the structural sparsity that the analytic decomposition into a circulant filter and a sparse backprojection exposes. We confirm the predicted scaling on CPU at small image scale and on GPU at medium image scale, all on the same scaling law. Beyond CT reconstruction, the estimator applies to physics-informed neural networks that hardcode a known physical operation in its architecture, and we expect the result to be of interest for a broad community working on operator-aware deep learning. Calibrating the per-layer constants on each sweep yields a bound that tracks the empirical test MSE within a factor of two at every training-set size, so the estimator can be inverted to predict how many training samples are required to reach a target error.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 18 references.
References · 11
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 433
- 2022Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningcited by 65
- 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
- 2019Learning with Known Operators reduces Maximum Training Error Boundscited by 25
- 2019PYRO-NN: Python Reconstruction Operators in Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2021Known Operator Learning and Hybrid Machine Learning in Medical Imaging -- A Review of the Past, the Present, and the Futurecited by 18
- 2025Position: A Theory of Deep Learning Must Include Compositional Sparsitycited by 14
- 2022To be or not to be stable, that is the question: understanding neural networks for inverse problemscited by 8
- 2023Neural Hilbert Ladders: Multi-Layer Neural Networks in Function Spacecited by 5
- 2024Deep Neural Networks are Adaptive to Function Regularity and Data Distribution in Approximation and Estimationcited by 3
- 2024Learning sparsity-promoting regularizers for linear inverse problemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Agentic Autoresearch for CT Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026Agentic Autoresearch for CT Reconstruction24 Jul 2026