Rethinking Dense Optical Flow without Test-Time Scaling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent progress in dense optical flow has been driven by increasingly complex architectures and multi-step refinement for test-time scaling. While these approaches achieve strong benchmark performance, they also require substantial computation during inference. This raises a fundamental question: Is scaling test-time computation the only way to improve dense optical flow accuracy? We argue that it is not. Instead, powerful visual semantic and geometric priors encoded in modern foundation models can reduce, if not overcome, the need for computationally expensive iterative refinement at test-time. In this paper, we present a framework that estimates dense optical flow in a single forward pass, leveraging pretrained foundation representations, while avoiding iterative refinement and additional inference-time computation, thus offering an alternative to test-time scaling. Our method extracts visual semantic features from a frozen DINO-v2 backbone and combines them with geometric cues from a monocular depth foundation model. We fuse these complementary priors into a unified representation and apply a global matching formulation to estimate dense correspondences without recurrent updates or test-time optimization. Despite avoiding iterative refinement, our approach achieves strong cross-dataset generalization across challenging benchmarks. On Sintel Final, we obtain 2.81 EPE without refinement, significantly improving over state-of-the-art (SOTA) SEA-RAFT under comparable training conditions and outperforming RAFT, GMFlow (without refinement), and recent FlowSeek in the same setting. These results suggest that strong foundation priors can substitute for test-time scaling, offering a computationally efficient alternative to refinement-heavy pipelines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
35 of 45 references.
References · 35
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
- 2024Depth Anything V2cited by 1,422
- 2024Depth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Datacited by 1,360
- 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 881
- 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 784
- 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 327
- 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 275
23 more
- 2024SEA-RAFT: Simple, Efficient, Accurate RAFT for Optical Flowcited by 174
- 2023Segment Any Point Cloud Sequences by Distilling Vision Foundation Modelscited by 125
- 2020Flow-edge Guided Video Completioncited by 104
- 2018Models Matter, So Does Training: An Empirical Study of CNNs for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 94
- 2017Optical Flow Guided Feature: A Fast and Robust Motion Representation for Video Action Recognitioncited by 82
- 2019Motion Guided Attention for Video Salient Object Detectioncited by 72
- 2023VA-DepthNet: A Variational Approach to Single Image Depth Predictioncited by 54
- 2018Representation Flow for Action Recognitioncited by 51
- 2023Improving the Generalization of Segmentation Foundation Model under Distribution Shift via Weakly Supervised Adaptationcited by 31
- 2017Monocular Dense 3D Reconstruction of a Complex Dynamic Scene from Two Perspective Framescited by 27
- 2019Superpixel Soup: Monocular Dense 3D Reconstruction of a Complex Dynamic Scenecited by 22
- 2018Scalable Dense Non-rigid Structure-from-Motion: A Grassmannian Perspectivecited by 19
- 2019Non-Rigid Structure from Motion: Prior-Free Factorization Method Revisitedcited by 18
- 2022Organic Priors in Non-Rigid Structure from Motioncited by 15
- 2023Single Image Depth Prediction Made Better: A Multivariate Gaussian Takecited by 14
- 2019Jumping Manifolds: Geometry Aware Dense Non-Rigid Structure from Motioncited by 12
- 2025FlowSeek: Optical Flow Made Easier with Depth Foundation Models and Motion Basescited by 10
- 2026Flow4R: Unifying 4D Reconstruction and Tracking with Scene Flowcited by 8
- 2023Learning Robust Multi-Scale Representation for Neural Radiance Fields from Unposed Imagescited by 7
- 2023Enhanced Stable View Synthesiscited by 5
- 2024Zero-Shot Monocular Motion Segmentation in the Wild by Combining Deep Learning with Geometric Motion Model Fusioncited by 4
- 2023Uncertainty-Driven Dense Two-View Structure from Motioncited by 3
- 2025Boosting Generative Adversarial Transferability with Self-supervised Vision Transformer Featurescited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024DepthFM: Fast Monocular Depth Estimation with Flow Matching
- 2025FlowR: Flowing from Sparse to Dense 3D Reconstructions
- 2026InjectFlow: Weak Guides Strong via Orthogonal Injection for Flow Matching
- 2025FoundationSLAM: Unleashing the Power of Depth Foundation Models for End-to-End Dense Visual SLAM
- 2026Contextual Flow Matching: Adaptive Step Selection in Flow Models for Efficient Visual Generation
- 2026RenderFlow: Single-Step Neural Rendering via Flow Matching
- 2026DVD: Deterministic Video Depth Estimation with Generative Priors
- 2025A Study of Finetuning Video Transformers for Multi-view Geometry Tasks