mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discovering Ordinary Differential Equations with LLM-Based Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation

arXiv 2605.07323 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discovering governing differential equations from observational data is a fundamental challenge in scientific machine learning. Existing symbolic regression approaches rely primarily on quantitative metrics; however, real-world differential equation modeling also requires incorporating domain knowledge to ensure physical plausibility. To address this gap, we propose DoLQ, a method for discovering ordinary differential equations with LLM-based qualitative and quantitative evaluation. DoLQ employs a multi-agent architecture: a Sampler Agent proposes dynamic system candidates, a Parameter Optimizer refines equations for accuracy, and a Scientist Agent leverages an LLM to conduct both qualitative and quantitative evaluations and synthesize their results to iteratively guide the search. Experiments on multi-dimensional ordinary differential equation benchmarks demonstrate that DoLQ achieves superior performance compared to existing methods, not only attaining higher success rates but also more accurately recovering the correct symbolic terms of ground truth equations. Our code is available at https://github.com/Bon99yun/DoLQ.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 49 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  2. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  4. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  5. 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 397
  6. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  7. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  8. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
  9. 2017Sobolev Training for Neural Networkscited by 143
  10. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 105
  11. 2024Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Librarycited by 83
  12. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
9 more
  1. 2023ODEFormer: Symbolic Regression of Dynamical Systems with Transformerscited by 62
  2. 2022Stabilized Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Long-Time Forecasting of Dynamical Systemscited by 50
  3. 2023SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingcited by 47
  4. 2024In-Context Symbolic Regression: Leveraging Large Language Models for Function Discoverycited by 31
  5. 2025PDE-Controller: LLMs for Autoformalization and Reasoning of PDEscited by 23
  6. 2024Symbolic regression via MDLformer-guided search: from minimizing prediction error to minimizing description lengthcited by 17
  7. 2023Finite Element Operator Network for Solving Elliptic-type parametric PDEscited by 14
  8. 2025Improving Monte Carlo Tree Search for Symbolic Regressioncited by 6
  9. 2018Analysing Symbolic Regression Benchmarks under a Meta-Learning Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.