mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Material-Aware Hamiltonian Risk Fields for Safe Navigation

arXiv 2605.07038 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.LG cs.MA cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Risk-aware navigation should be selective: a policy should expose evasive degrees of freedom only when the local scene admits a lower-risk feasible maneuver, and suppress them when no safer alternative exists. We show that adding one context-energy term to a port-Hamiltonian navigation policy produces a learned force channel with exactly this falsifiable signature. When the local risk field contains a feasible lower-risk direction, the induced context force activates toward it; when the apparent escape is blocked or not yet available, a route-aware gate suppresses lateral force rather than hallucinating an unsafe maneuver. A CVaR tail-risk objective focuses gradient updates on rare but consequential risk transitions. We validate the selectivity signature across four settings. In the primary delayed-required-escape benchmark, route-aware CVaR reduces premature force activation from 0.950 to 0.180 versus DWA while raising success from 0.480 to 0.810 with zero replans. On real off-road terrain (RELLIS-3D), route-aware enrichment achieves correct activation rate 0.837 and false activation rate 0.114, compared to 0.378/0.752 for scalar risk gradients. On static semantic maps (DFC2018), enrichment reduces catastrophic failure from 0.60 to 0.10 and oscillation by 90.7% while preserving path efficiency. In highway traffic, collisions drop from 100% to 0% when a lane escape is feasible; when no escape exists, the policy suppresses the lateral maneuver. The selectivity property follows from the gradient structure of the context energy rather than from training-time tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
  5. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  6. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  7. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  8. 2021RMA: Rapid Motor Adaptation for Legged Robotscited by 430
  9. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  10. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
  11. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  12. 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 261
5 more
  1. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 183
  2. 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
  3. 2021Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks for Learning Explicit Time-Dependent Dynamical Systemscited by 66
  4. 2022TerraPN: Unstructured Terrain Navigation using Online Self-Supervised Learningcited by 3
  5. 2025GRL-SNAM: Geometric Reinforcement Learning with Path Differential Hamiltonians for Simultaneous Navigation and Mapping in Unknown Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.