Self-Driving Datasets: From 20 Million Papers to Nuanced Biomedical Knowledge at Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Manually curated biomedical repositories -- spanning bioactivity, genomics, and chemistry -- are expensive to maintain, lag behind primary literature, and discard experimental context, obscuring nuances needed to assess data correctness and coverage. We show that PubMed itself can be autonomously and cost-effectively turned into structured datasets that are larger, more nuanced, and more accurate than the curated databases they replace. We present three coupled contributions: (1) an LLM-based entity-tagging pipeline, grounded in nine biomedical ontologies, that tags 4.5B entities across 19 categories in a 22.5M-paper, 2.5T-token PubMed corpus; (2) hybrid sparse-dense retrieval supporting entity-filtered semantic queries over the tagged corpus; and (3) Starling, a multi-agent deep research system that, given only a natural-language task description, designs precision- and recall-targeted retrieval filters, induces an extraction schema, and emits structured records with nuance-rich fields and supporting passages. Across six tasks -- blood-brain barrier permeability, oral bioavailability, acute toxicity (LD50), gene-disease associations, protein subcellular localization, and chemical reactions -- Starling produces ~6.3M records (91K-3M per task); several are, to our knowledge, the largest public datasets for their property. Frontier-model rejection of our extractions is 0.6-7.7% across tasks, far below error rates we measure on widely used curated counterparts (e.g., 16.5% on BBB_Martins, 7.3% on Bioavailability_Ma). Beyond scale and accuracy, the supporting passages carry nuance tabular databases discard -- e.g., oral bioavailability may depend on fed vs. fasted state. Together, the corpus, retrieval, and agent establish a foundation for AI-driven therapeutic design. Code and datasets: https://github.com/starling-labs/starling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 65 references.
References · 17
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 609
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
- 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
- 2022Large Language Models are Few-Shot Clinical Information Extractorscited by 206
- 2023PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Researchcited by 143
- 2024Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledgecited by 121
- 2025Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discoverycited by 78
- 2022BERN2: an advanced neural biomedical named entity recognition and normalization toolcited by 42
- 2024PubTator 3.0: an AI-powered Literature Resource for Unlocking Biomedical Knowledgecited by 29
5 more
- 2024Aviary: training language agents on challenging scientific taskscited by 23
- 2024textttMiniMol: A Parameter-Efficient Foundation Model for Molecular Learningcited by 19
- 2024ReactXT: Understanding Molecular "Reaction-ship" via Reaction-Contextualized Molecule-Text Pretrainingcited by 19
- 2025Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?cited by 6
- 2023Holistic chemical evaluation reveals pitfalls in reaction prediction modelscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.