mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Based Flow Matching for Full-Field Prediction of Silicon Photonic Devices

arXiv 2605.06929 ↗First posted 7 May 2026physics.optics cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing photonic integrated circuits requires accurate electromagnetic field simulations, which remain computationally expensive even for simple device geometries. We present PIC-Flow, a generative neural surrogate that predicts electromagnetic field distributions for photonic devices given their geometry and operating wavelength as an alternative to costly finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations. Our approach combines three key ideas: (i) conditional flow matching as the generative framework, learning a velocity field that transports Gaussian noise to physically valid field solutions; (ii) a real-valued U-Net operating on split real and imaginary field channels; and (iii) physics-constrained training through a Helmholtz residual loss enforcing nabla2 Ez + k02 varepsilon Ez = 0. We introduce an interface-aware masking scheme for the Helmholtz residual that excludes dielectric boundary pixels where finite-difference stencil errors dominate, yielding a physically meaningful compliance metric. The data set consists of 22,500 ground-truth FDTD simulations split evenly between multimode interferometers, Y-branches, and directional couplers at λ=1.55,μm in an 80/10/10 split between training, validation, and test sets. We evaluate ablations on the network against the held out test devices and also show that the model generalizes to held out device classes such as S-bends, tapers, and cascaded Y-branches. Rather than a drop-in replacement for FDTD, this work establishes a foundation that, with broader data coverage, more compute, and further training optimization, could scale toward broadband, device-agnostic field prediction with dramatically improved runtime for rapid design-space exploration of complex photonic devices and circuits.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 2 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 5 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints10 Jun

Other references · 1

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Physics-guided and fabrication-aware inverse design of photonic devices using diffusion models
  2. 2022NeurOLight: A Physics-Agnostic Neural Operator Enabling Parametric Photonic Device Simulation
  3. 2025Physics-Constrained Adaptive Neural Networks Enable Real-Time Semiconductor Manufacturing Optimization with Minimal Training Data
  4. 2024Meent: Differentiable Electromagnetic Simulator for Machine Learning
  5. 2026Constrained Co-Design for Photonic Bayesian Neural Networks
  6. 2026Accelerating Diffusion Models for Generative AI Applications with Silicon Photonics
  7. 2026Inverse-designed meta processing units for multi-task near-field photonic computing
  8. 2026Joint Discrete-Continuous Flow Matching for Open-Vocabulary Inverse Design of Multilayer Optical Coatings