Visual Text Compression as Measure Transport
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual text compression (VTC) promises efficient long-context processing by rendering text into an image and re-encoding it with a vision-language model, often producing 3--20× fewer decoder tokens than subword tokenization. Yet token savings do not translate predictably into downstream utility: on some tasks the visual path matches or exceeds the text path, on others it collapses, and the compression ratio itself does not predict which regime will occur. The missing quantity is therefore not another summary of efficiency, but a principled measure of task-relevant information loss induced by visual encoding. We address this problem by formulating VTC in the language of measure transport. Treating text and visual tokens as empirical probability measures, we show that the ViT patch encoder induces a push-forward map whose transport cost decomposes into a precision cost from within-patch aggregation and a coverage cost from cross-patch fragmentation. Both terms are estimable from downstream-label-free probes. This formulation yields two operational consequences: a downstream-label-free routing criterion that selects whether to use the visual path for a given input or benchmark instance, and a transport-informed foveation mechanism that re-encodes high-cost regions at higher resolution. Across 24 NLP datasets at Qwen3-4B, our label-free rule matches the per-dataset oracle on 17/24 datasets (70.8%), and improves the average task score by +3.3% with -10.3% average tokens relative to a pure-LLM.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 4 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
4 of 54 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 3
- 2024Routers in Vision Mixture of Experts: An Empirical Studycited by 23
- 2025Enhancing CLIP Robustness via Cross-Modality Alignmentcited by 15
- 2025Selective Sinkhorn Routing for Improved Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Decoupling semantics from vision: A framework for faithful visual-text compression evaluation
- 2026ZeroSense:How Vision matters in Long Context Compression
- 2025Text or Pixels? It Takes Half: On the Token Efficiency of Visual Text Inputs in Multimodal LLMs
- 2024Visual-Word Tokenizer: Beyond Fixed Sets of Tokens in Vision Transformers
- 2026Aggregating Visual Information with Optimal Transport for VideoLM Token Compression
- 2026ApET: Approximation-Error Guided Token Compression for Efficient VLMs
- 2026Same Semantics, Different Paths: Self-Improving Alignment for Vision-Text Compression
- 2025Are We Using the Right Benchmark: An Evaluation Framework for Visual Token Compression Methods