Beyond the Independence Assumption: Finite-Sample Guarantees for Deep Q-Learning under τ-Mixing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Finite-sample analyses of deep Q-learning typically treat replayed data as independent, even though it is sampled from temporally dependent state-action trajectories. We study the Deep Q-networks (DQN) algorithm under explicit dependence by modelling the minibatches used for updating the network as τ-mixing. We show that this assumption holds under certain dependence conditions on the underlying trajectories and the mechanism used to sample minibatches. Building on this observation, we extend statistical analyses of DQN with fully connected ReLU architectures to dependent data. We formulate each update as a nonparametric regression problem with τ-mixing observations and derive finite-sample risk bounds under this dependence structure. Our results show that temporal dependence leads to a degradation in the statistical rate by inducing an additional dimensionality penalty in the rate exponent, reflecting the reduced effective sample size of τ-mixing data. Moreover, we derive the sample complexity of DQN under tau-mixing from these risk bounds. Finally, we empirically demonstrate on standard Gymnasium environments that the independence assumption is systematically violated and that replay sampling yields approximately exponentially decaying correlations, supporting our theoretical framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 44 references.
References · 19
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
- 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2019Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learningcited by 169
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrabilitycited by 122
- 2019A Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Learning with Neural Network Function Approximationcited by 47
- 2022Theoretical analysis of deep neural networks for temporally dependent observationscited by 16
7 more
- 2022Understanding Deep Neural Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning via ε-Greedy Explorationcited by 11
- 2019Asymptotics of Reinforcement Learning with Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2022Analysis of Stochastic Processes through Replay Bufferscited by 9
- 2020Can Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Learn Representation? A Mean-Field Theorycited by 7
- 2023On the Performance of Temporal Difference Learning With Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2024A Simple Note on the Basic Properties of Subgaussian Random Variablescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.