On the Role of Language Representations in Auto-Bidding: Findings and Implications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Auto-bidding is a crucial task in real-time advertising markets, where policies must optimize long-horizon value under delivery constraints (e.g., budget and CPA). Existing methods for auto-bidding rely on compact numerical state representations: while they can implicitly capture delivery dynamics, they offer limited support for explicitly representing and controlling high-level intent, evolving feedback, and operator-style strategic guidance in real campaigns. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a powerful method for encoding semantic information, it remains unclear when LLMs help and how to integrate them without sacrificing numerical precision. Through systematic preliminary studies, we find that (1) LLM embeddings contain bidding-relevant cues yet cannot replace numerical features, and (2) gains emerge only with careful semantic--numeric integration rather than naive concatenation. Motivated by these findings, we propose textitSemBid, a novel auto-bidding framework that injects LLM-encoded semantics into offline bidding trajectories at the token level. SemBid introduces three semantic inputs: textitTask, textitHistory, and textitStrategy. It injects these semantics as tokens alongside numerical trajectory tokens and uses self-attention to integrate them, improving controllability and generalization across objectives. Across diverse scenarios and budget regimes, SemBid outperforms competitive baselines from offline RL and generative sequence modeling, with more consistent gains in overall performance, constraint satisfaction, and robustness. Our code is available at: hrefhttps://github.com/AlanYu04/SemBid-KDD2026textcolorbluehere.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 40 references.
References · 13
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 492
- 2022Can Wikipedia Help Offline Reinforcement Learning?cited by 77
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximationcited by 71
- 2024DeLLMa: Decision Making Under Uncertainty with Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025LLM-Auction: Generative Auction towards LLM-Native Advertisingcited by 12
- 2024AIGB: Generative Auto-bidding via Conditional Diffusion Modelingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Strategy-Aware Parameter-Efficient Adaptation for LLM-based Auto-Bidding ↗
- 2026LBM: Hierarchical Large Auto-Bidding Model via Reasoning and Acting
- 2026AIGB-R1: Self-Evolving Generative Auto-Bidding via Hierarchical Planner-Executor Optimization
- 2026LLM Advertisement based on Neuron Auctions
- 2025RTBAgent: A LLM-based Agent System for Real-Time Bidding
- 2026DARA: Few-shot Budget Allocation in Online Advertising via In-Context Decision Making with RL-Finetuned LLMs
- 2025LLM Bidders Preserve the Mechanism-Level Orderings of Human Bidders
- 2026DRIVE: Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value Evaluation