mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safety-Critical Camera Reliability Monitoring for ADAS via Degradation-Aware Uncertainty Pattern Analysis

arXiv 2605.05439 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable camera input is essential for safety-critical ADAS perception, but most monitoring approaches detect sensor failures only after downstream performance has degraded. We propose a proactive camera reliability monitoring framework that estimates perception risk from degradation-induced uncertainty patterns before downstream failure becomes observable. The method introduces a Global Sensor Health Index (GSHI), a continuous reliability score that aggregates per-degradation severities using a risk-aware multiplicative formulation, allowing severe single-mode failures such as lens occlusion or motion blur to dominate the health estimate. A lightweight multi-task network predicts degradation type, severity, GSHI, and spatial uncertainty maps from a single RGB image without downstream task feedback. Training uses physics- and geometry-aware synthetic supervision over twelve camera degradation modes. Experiments on KITTI-derived degradations show that GSHI decreases monotonically with severity, achieves a health-estimation MAE of 0.064, and provides positive early-warning lead time of 0.47 ± 0.25 severity units before YOLOv8 detection failure. GSHI also outperforms IQA, detector-confidence, and clean-feature OOD baselines, and transfers zero-shot to real adverse-weather driving data. These results support degradation-aware uncertainty analysis as a practical direction for proactive camera reliability monitoring in intelligent vehicles.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  5. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  6. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  7. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,803
  8. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  9. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  10. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  11. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 403
  12. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 336
2 more
  1. 2019Physics-Based Rendering for Improving Robustness to Raincited by 49
  2. 2020DAWN: Vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature Datasetcited by 41

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.