Breaking the Quality-Privacy Tradeoff in Tabular Data Generation via In-Context Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tabular data synthesis aims to generate high-quality data while preserving privacy. However, we find that existing tabular generative models exhibit a clear tradeoff in the small-data regime: improving data quality typically comes at the cost of increased memorization of training samples, thereby weakening privacy protection. This tradeoff arises because small training sets make it difficult for dataset-specific generative models to distinguish generalizable structure from sample-specific patterns. To address this, we propose DiffICL, which formulates tabular data generation as an in-context learning problem. Instead of fitting each dataset from scratch,DiffICL leverages pretrained structural priors learned from a large collection of datasets, enabling it to infer data distributions from limited context rather than memorizing individual samples. We evaluate DiffICL on 14 real-world datasets. Results show that DiffICL improves both data quality and privacy, and generate synthetic data that provides effective data augmentation. Our findings suggest that the quality-privacy tradeoff can be improved through better training paradigms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 48 references.
References · 26
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 377
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 289
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
- 2023Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Spacecited by 186
- 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 185
14 more
- 2021CTAB-GAN: Effective Table Data Synthesizingcited by 156
- 2024TabDPT: Scaling Tabular Foundation Models on Real Datacited by 113
- 2018Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
- 2022STaSy: Score-based Tabular data Synthesiscited by 86
- 2025Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Trainingcited by 81
- 2025LimiX: Unleashing Structured-Data Modeling Capability for Generalist Intelligencecited by 79
- 2023CoDi: Co-evolving Contrastive Diffusion Models for Mixed-type Tabular Synthesiscited by 78
- 2025Mitra: Mixed Synthetic Priors for Enhancing Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 77
- 2024TabDiff: a Mixed-type Diffusion Model for Tabular Data Generationcited by 63
- 2024TALENT: A Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolboxcited by 52
- 2025Real-TabPFN: Improving Tabular Foundation Models via Continued Pre-training With Real-World Datacited by 41
- 2024CTSyn: A Foundation Model for Cross Tabular Data Generationcited by 14
- 2024An improved tabular data generator with VAE-GMM integrationcited by 13
- 2024Synthetic Data: Revisiting the Privacy-Utility Trade-offcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.