Every Step Counts: Step-Level Credit Assignment for Tool-Integrated Text-to-SQL
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tool-integrated Text-to-SQL parsing has emerged as a promising paradigm, framing SQL generation as a sequential decision-making process interleaved with tool execution. However, existing reinforcement learning approaches mainly rely on coarse-grained outcome supervision, resulting in a fundamental credit assignment problem: models receive the same reward for any trajectory that yields the correct answer, even when intermediate steps are redundant, inefficient, or erroneous. Consequently, models are encouraged to explore suboptimal reasoning spaces, limiting both efficiency and generalization. To address this problem, we propose FineStep, a novel framework for step-level credit assignment in tool-augmented Text-to-SQL. First, we introduce a reward design with independent process rewards to alleviate the signal sparsity of outcome supervision. Next, we present a step-level credit assignment mechanism to precisely quantify the value of each reasoning step. Finally, we develop a policy optimization method based on step-level advantages for efficient updates. Extensive experiments on BIRD benchmarks show that FineStep achieves state-of-the-art performance and reduces redundant tool interactions, with a 3.25% average EX gain over GRPO at the 4B scale.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
40 of 54 references.
References · 40
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
- 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
- 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
- 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 183
28 more
- 2025SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoningcited by 145
- 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 132
- 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
- 2020Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suitescited by 123
- 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
- 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 103
- 2021Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalizationcited by 92
- 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 90
- 2025SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
- 2025Reasoning-SQL: Reinforcement Learning with SQL Tailored Partial Rewards for Reasoning-Enhanced Text-to-SQLcited by 59
- 2025rStar2-Agent: Agentic Reasoning Technical Reportcited by 54
- 2024Synthesizing Text-to-SQL Data from Weak and Strong LLMscited by 53
- 2024Before Generation, Align it! A Novel and Effective Strategy for Mitigating Hallucinations in Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 49
- 2025ComputerRL: Scaling End-to-End Online Reinforcement Learning for Computer Use Agentscited by 49
- 2025Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQLcited by 38
- 2023Natural Language Interfaces for Tabular Data Querying and Visualization: A Surveycited by 27
- 2025AgentRM: Enhancing Agent Generalization with Reward Modelingcited by 25
- 2025Reward-SQL: Boosting Text-to-SQL via Stepwise Execution-Aware Reasoning and Process-Supervised Rewardscited by 25
- 2025Agentar-Scale-SQL: Advancing Text-to-SQL through Orchestrated Test-Time Scalingcited by 20
- 2025SQL-o1: A Self-Reward Heuristic Dynamic Search Method for Text-to-SQLcited by 19
- 2024Improving Retrieval-augmented Text-to-SQL with AST-based Ranking and Schema Pruningcited by 16
- 2025MARS-SQL: A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 14
- 2024ROUTE: Robust Multitask Tuning and Collaboration for Text-to-SQLcited by 13
- 2026Exploring Reasoning Reward Model for Agentscited by 13
- 2025STEP: Success-Rate-Aware Trajectory-Efficient Policy Optimizationcited by 11
- 2025MTIR-SQL: Multi-turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQLcited by 10
- 2025ReEx-SQL: Reasoning with Execution-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQLcited by 8
- 2024Grounding Natural Language to SQL Translation with Data-Based Self-Explanationscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Graph-Reward-SQL: Execution-Free Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL via Graph Matching and Stepwise Reward
- 2026FINER-SQL: Boosting Small Language Models for Text-to-SQL
- 2026Progress-SQL: Improving Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL via Progressive Rewards
- 2026CAPER: Clause-Aligned Process Supervision for Text-to-SQL
- 2026SQLConductor: Search-to-Policy Learning for Step-wise Text-to-SQL Orchestration
- 2026Beyond Static Pipelines: Learning Dynamic Workflows for Text-to-SQL
- 2025Sparks of Tabular Reasoning via Text2SQL Reinforcement Learning
- 2026SPOC-SQL: Stage-wise Preference Optimization for Controllable Text-to-SQL