mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Joint Semantic Token Selection and Prompt Optimization for Interpretable Prompt Learning

arXiv 2605.04425 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models such as CLIP achieve strong visual-textual alignment, but often suffer from overfitting and limited interpretability when adapted through continuous prompt learning. While discrete prompt optimization improves interpretability, it usually depends on large external models, leading to high computational costs and limited scalability. In this paper, we propose Interpretable Prompt Learning (IPL), a hybrid framework that alternates between discrete semantic token selection and continuous prompt optimization. Specifically, IPL formulates semantic token selection as an approximate submodular optimization problem, encouraging tokens that are both human-understandable and semantically diverse. It further adopts an alternating optimization strategy to integrate discrete token selection with continuous prompt tuning, improving interpretability while preserving adaptability to downstream tasks. Our framework is plug-and-play, allowing seamless integration with existing prompt learning methods. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that IPL consistently improves both interpretability and accuracy across five representative prompt learning methods, providing an effective and scalable extension to existing frameworks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Generalizable Prompt Learning of CLIP: A Brief Overview3 Mar
  2. 2024Tree of Attributes Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models15 Oct
  3. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimization23 Mar

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  5. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  6. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  7. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  9. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  10. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  12. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
13 more
  1. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  2. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  3. 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 319
  4. 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
  5. 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
  6. 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
  7. 2023LLaVA-Plus: Learning to Use Tools for Creating Multimodal Agentscited by 188
  8. 2021SIMILAR: Submodular Information Measures Based Active Learning In Realistic Scenarioscited by 83
  9. 2019apricot: Submodular selection for data summarization in Pythoncited by 21
  10. 2018Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approachcited by 14
  11. 2024Maximization of Approximately Submodular Functionscited by 6
  12. 2024IntCoOp: Interpretability-Aware Vision-Language Prompt Tuningcited by 5
  13. 2019Submodular Optimization Problems and Greedy Strategies: A Surveycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024IPO: Interpretable Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2023Tuning Multi-mode Token-level Prompt Alignment across Modalities
  3. 2022Learning Domain Invariant Prompt for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Integrated Structural Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026What Does Prompt Learning Change? -A Natural-Language Concept Analysis of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Optimization of Prompt Learning via Multi-Knowledge Representation for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2023Knowledge-Aware Prompt Tuning for Generalizable Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Constrained Prompt Enhancement for Improving Zero-Shot Generalization of Vision-Language Models